Supported living refurbishment at Nazareth House, Liverpool Road, Crosby
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Sefton Planning Committee on 15 Oct 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought listed building consent for remodelling and refurbishment connected with changing a former children’s home into supported living accommodation.
“DC/2025/00402 Listed Building Consent for remodelling and refurbishment works to the external and internal fabric of Nazareth Villa and ancillary works.”
“The site comprises Nazareth House (that portion called Crosby House only) which is a Grade II Listed Italianate villa built in the early-mid 19 th century. The proposal seeks planning permission and listed building consent for the change of use of Nazareth Villa from a children’s home to supported living accommodation for homeless individuals. The scheme includes minor physical alterations to the site.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Various planning applications had been made on the site, but none were relevant to this scheme.
“There have been various planning applications on the site, none of which are relevant to this scheme.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval with conditions because the care-related use was acceptable and the proposal addressed design, heritage, amenity, highways, ecology and biodiversity matters.
“The main planning issues for consideration include the principle of development, design and potential impact on the surrounding area, including the heritage assets, neighbouring living conditions, tree and landscaping, the highways requirements ecology and biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements.”
“The site is located within an area designated as a care institution under the Sefton Local Plan. The proposed use is considered to remain within the scope of care-related activities and is considered to align with the policy objectives and to comply with the adopted Local Plan policies. In the absence of any other material considerations, the planning application is recommended for approval subject to conditions.”
Officer report
Consultees’ responses
The conservation, highways, environmental health and ecology consultees raised no objections subject to conditions, while other listed consultees also raised no objection.
“Conservation Manager No objection subject to conditions.”
“Highways Manager No objection subject to conditions.”
Officer report
Who spoke
The committee heard a petition on behalf of objectors and a response from the applicant’s agent.
Committee consideration
The committee considered the applications and the recommendation that both permissions be granted subject to stated conditions and reasons.
“The Committee considered the report of the Chief Planning Officer recommending that the above applications for (a) the change of use of Nazareth Villa from a children's home to supported living accommodation including the insertion of new windows, a replacement gate, a cycle store and reconfigured hard surfacing and ancillary works following the removal of a fire escape and ladder (application No.”
Minutes
Sources
- Sefton Planning Committee minutes, 15 October 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Sefton's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Sefton Planning Committee
- Council
- Sefton
- Date
- Wednesday 15 October 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Sefton committee decisions →
This committee's year
10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.