Self-build dwelling at Land adjacent 1 Austen Drive, Bramley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rotherham Planning Board on 22 Jan 2026.
The meeting was recorded; the recording is on the council's website.
What was proposed
A two-storey self-build detached house was proposed in the side garden, with a separate highway access and parking for both properties.
“The application is for the construction of a new self build two storey detached dwelling to the side garden of 1 Austen Drive, with its own highway access.”
“The applicant has also provided a plan showing how off street parking can also be provided for the host property.”
Officer report
The site
The site was a large side garden beside a semi-detached house in a mainly suburban area of semi-detached homes.
“The application site is the side garden to 1 Austen Drive, a semi detached dwelling set within a suburban setting. The dwelling includes a large side garden and a detached garage fronts onto Austen drive. The street contains predominately semi detached properties.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended conditional approval subject to a Section 106 agreement confirming the self-build status and biodiversity exemption.
“RB2025/1483 https://rotherham.planportal.co.uk/?id=RB2025/1483 Proposal and Location Erection of self build residential dwelling at Land adjacent 1, Austen Drive, Bramley, Rotherham, S66 2UF Recommendation Grant Conditionally Subject to Section 106 Agreement…”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Environmental health, highways, land contamination, drainage and ecology consultees raised no objections subject to conditions, while the water company made no comment.
“Environmental Health Services – Raise no objections to the granting of planning permission in a Environmental Health context subject to conditions.”
“RMBC Land Contamination – Raise no objections to the granting of planning permission in a Land Contamination context subject to conditions…”
Officer report
What residents said
Eleven representations raised concerns about amenity, privacy, daylight, character, parking, traffic, trees, biodiversity, safety and construction impacts.
“- loss of outlook and visual amenity - Concerns with privacy - height and positioning would directly obstruct the open view - Concerns in regards to potential loss of daylight to neighbouring dwellings - the scale and proximity of this development would result in a substantial negative impact on the character of the area and the sense of openness that currently exists - concerns that properties surround will feel overshadowed and enclosed - concerns regarding parking and…”
“- proposed development does not appear to provide adequate off-street parking to accommodate its likely needs - Increased competition for already limited parking spaces, exacerbate congestion, and create difficulty for residents, visitors, pedestrians, school children and service vehicles - the proposal would have an unreasonably detrimental effect on residential amenity and local infrastructure - Out of Keeping with the Existing Street Scene - Loss of Countryside Views -…”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee granted the application for reasons adopted by members and subject to the relevant conditions in the report.
“(3) That application RB2025/1483 be granted for the reasons adopted by Members at the meeting and subject to the relevant conditions listed in the submitted report.”
Minutes
Conditions of approval
Approval included conditions covering materials, parking, electric vehicle charging, extensions, drainage, contamination, landscaping and biodiversity protection.
“Details of an electric vehicle charging points shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The approved electric vehicle charging point shall be implemented and made available for use prior to the occupation of the development hereby permitted. The arrangements shall be retained as such thereafter.”
“Notwithstanding the submitted details, no development shall take place (including, ground works and vegetation clearance) until a Construction Environmental Management Plan - Biodiversity (CEMP-B) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.”
Officer report
Sources
- Rotherham Planning Board minutes, 22 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rotherham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Rotherham Planning Board
- Council
- Rotherham
- Date
- Thursday 22 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Recording
- On the council's website
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Rotherham committee decisions →
This committee's year
11 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.