Children's home at 92 Swinston Hill Road, Dinnington

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Rotherham Planning Board on 24 Jul 2025.

RB2025/0610Approved

The meeting was recorded; the recording is on the council's website.

What was proposed

The application sought to change a dwelling into a children’s home for up to three children aged 11 to 17, with a widened access.

“This application seeks full planning permission for the change of use of the property from a dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a children’s home (Use Class C2) for up to 3 children. The application has been amended from the original proposal which was for 4 children to address highway concerns with regard to available off street parking.”

“The site has parking for three cars to the front and the existing vehicular access is proposed to be widened to 5m by removing of a section of the front boundary wall and extending the existing dropped kerb.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The site is an extended two-storey detached dwelling in a residential area, with three parking spaces and a large rear garden.

“The application relates to an existing extended two-storey detached dwelling located on Swinston Hill Road at Dinnington. The property is located within a residential area consisting of mixed house types set back from the adjacent highway with off road parking to the front and relatively large rear garden areas.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier permissions covered a garage, kitchen, bathroom and bedroom extension, and a two-storey rear extension with roof and porch changes.

“RB1978/3876 - Extn to form garage kitchen bathroom & bedroom – Granted…”

“RB2006/0803 - Two storey rear extension, new pitched roof to replace existing pitched & flat roof, formation of rooms in roof space and erect porch to front – Granted conditionally…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the proposal would be residential in character, with no significant amenity or highway impact subject to conditions.

“Taking account of the location of the dwelling and the nature of the proposed use it is considered that any noise and disturbance generated would be similar to a traditional family dwelling and whilst there could be an increase in comings and goings, especially at shift change over times, this would be within daytime hours so would not create such a significant impact on the amenity of neighbouring residents that would justify refusing planning permission on these grounds.”

“Furthermore, the presence of several carers at any one time will ensure that the children and/or young people in care are suitably supervised minimising any impact on the amenity of neighbours or the wider community, as well as the children themselves.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Transportation raised no highway objection subject to conditions, Environmental Health identified no issues, and the Police Liaison Officer supported the application in principle.

“RMBC – Transportation Infrastructure Service: Following receipt of additional information with regard to the rota system and the changes to the application to reduce the number of children to three and increase the width of the access they raise no objections in a highway context subject to relevant planning conditions being imposed as set out below.”

“SY Police Liaison Officer: Supportive of the application in principle and recommend improvements to door security and lighting as per Secured by Design standards.”

Officer report

Residents’ views

Seventy-three resident letters raised concerns about consultation, parking, traffic, safety, disturbance, antisocial behaviour and the site’s suitability; two letters supported it.

“The application has been advertised by way of a site notice along with individual neighbour notification letters to adjacent properties. 73 letters of representation have been received from local residents. The concerns raised can be summarised as follows: • The change of use should be notified to all surrounding areas not just immediate neighbours. Local residents were not adequately informed or consulted about the proposed change.”

“Dinnington St Johns Town Council have submitted the following objections. • While the Council understands and supports the necessity of providing appropriate care for vulnerable young people, we have serious concerns about the suitability of this proposal in its current form and in this specific location. • The proposed property is located within a quiet, residential area, primarily composed of family homes.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee granted the application for the reasons adopted at the meeting and subject to the relevant conditions.

“(2) That application RB2025/0610 be granted for the reasons adopted by Members at the meeting and subject to the relevant conditions listed in the submitted report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Rotherham Planning Board minutes, 24 July 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Rotherham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Rotherham
Date
Thursday 24 July 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Recording
On the council's website
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)