Single-storey rear extension at Voles, Moat Lane, Westfield
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 29 May 2025.
What was proposed
A single-storey rear extension would replace the existing conservatory and remain proportionate to the dwelling.
“RR/2025/536/P appear to subsume the existing dwelling. The proposed works also remain to provide a suitable amount of existing garden space for residents. The design and scale of the rear extension provide a proportionate addition to the existing dwelling.”
“The proposed single storey rear extension to replace an existing conservatory, would not harm the character and appearance of the main dwelling or the surrounding countryside area, including the landscape and scenic beauty of the HWNL/AONB. No harmful impact would occur to the amenities of the neighbouring properties or ecology. As such the proposal complies with relevant policies within the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy and DaSA.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The extension would be screened from the roadside and neighbouring homes, with established planting and a high brick wall providing separation.
“In terms of neighbouring properties, the host dwelling sits in between two properties – No. 37 to the south and High Hedges to the north. Both are detached dwellings.”
“No fenestration is proposed on the side elevations. The property is screened to the southern neighbour (No. 37) by established hedging, shrubs and trees and to the north (High Hedges) via an existing high level brick wall.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers concluded that the proposal complied with relevant policies and recommended full planning permission.
“RECOMMENDATION: GRANT (FULL PLANNING PERMISSION)”
Officer report
Main planning effects
The proposal would retain more than 10 metres of usable garden and was not expected to harm neighbours or protected species.
“The site lies within an Amber and Red Impact Risk Zone for GCNs, with the proposed works situated within the Red Impact Zone for protected species under the NatureSpace Partnership Scheme, which means the area provides a ‘highly suitable habitat’ for GCNs. In this case, the site is not within 50m of a pond and is unlikely to affect the habitat or population of the GCNs.”
“Policy DHG9 (iv) of the DaSA requires that extensions and outbuildings leave sufficient usable external private space for the occupiers of the dwelling in accordance with Policy DHG7 of the DaSA. Policy DHG7 expects an appropriately sized private usable external space of at least 10m in length.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee supported the recommendation and granted full planning permission unanimously.
“The Planning Committee was supportive of the officer’s recommendation, subject to conditions as outlined below.”
“Councillor Mrs Barnes moved the motion to GRANT (Full Planning Permission) subject to conditions and this was seconded by Councillor Ganly.”
Minutes
Conditions and advice
Permission requires approved plans, agreed materials, and rooflight details before installation, with advice about newts and smart glazing.
“The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and details:”
“Prior to the installation of the rooflight within the extension hereby permitted, details by way of scaled drawings of the rooflight’s design and its positioning in the extension herby approved, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be provided and thereafter retained as approved, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”
Minutes
Sources
- Rother Planning Committee minutes, 29 May 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Rother Planning Committee
- Council
- Rother
- Date
- Thursday 29 May 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Rother committee decisions →