Children’s residential home at 1 Clos Y Wennol, Llanilid, Pontyclun
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rhondda Planning and Development Committee on 16 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a dwelling into a children’s residential home for up to two children, without internal or external alterations.
“Full planning permission is sought for the change of use of an existing residential dwelling (Use Class C3) to a residential care home for up to 2 children (Use Class C2) at 1 Clos Y Wennol, Llanilid.”
Officer report
The site
The site was a two-storey detached house in a residential street under construction, with a driveway, garage, garden and surrounding residential properties.
“The application site refers to a two-storey detached property of modern design and construction located in a residential street currently still under construction as part of a wider residential development by Persimmon Homes at Llanilid.”
“The application property sits within an average sized plot, measuring approx. 0.016ha, with garden and associated amenity space surrounding the property. The dwelling benefits from a driveway accommodating 2 no. vehicles and a detached garage within its curtilage. No alterations to the existing access arrangements are proposed as part of the change of use.”
Officer report
Application history
The application was first considered by the committee on 6 November 2025 and was deferred so members could receive more information.
“The Head of Major Development and Investment presented the application which was originally reported to Committee on 6 th November 2025, where Members deferred the application to receive more information. The Head of Major Development and Investment presented a further report on 5 th March 2026 following consideration of which Members were minded to refuse the application, contrary to the officer recommendation of the Director, Housing and…”
Minutes
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the site was sustainable, the use would remain largely residential, and no harm was expected to the area, neighbours or highway safety.
“REASONS: The application site is in located within a residential area and within the settlement boundary limits of Llanilid. The site is therefore in a sustainable location.”
“The site also relates to an existing residential property and, other than the presence of a small number of staff and an element of care provided, the proposed use would remain and continue to be largely residential in nature.”
Officer report
Members’ considerations
Members considered the strengths and weaknesses of refusing the application contrary to the officer recommendation after receiving further information and a late letter.
“Members gave consideration to the report, highlighting the potential strengths and weaknesses of refusing the application contrary to officer recommendation and following discussions, it was RESOLVED to refuse the application contrary to the recommendation of the Director of Housing and Regeneration for the reason below:”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee refused the application because it considered the use would increase fear of crime, harm community cohesion and create excessive activity and disturbance.
“The proposed development has resulted, and would continue to result, in an increased fear of crime in the vicinity and would adversely affect community cohesion. The intensified comings and goings to the property would generate levels of activity and disturbance in excess of those reasonable expected for a dwelling of this kind.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“For the reason below: The proposed development has resulted, and would continue to result, in an increased fear of crime in the vicinity and would adversely affect community cohesion. The intensified comings and goings to the property would generate levels of activity and disturbance in excess of those reasonable expected for a dwelling of this kind. For these reasons the proposal would be harmful to the amenity of neighboring occupiers and is contrary to Policies AW5 and AW10 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Rhondda Planning and Development Committee minutes, 16 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rhondda's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Rhondda
- Date
- Thursday 16 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Rhondda committee decisions →
This committee's year
72 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.