Synthetic PlayZone at Grangetown Youth and Community Centre, Grangetown

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Redcar And Cleveland Regulatory Committee on 25 Sept 2025.

R/2025/0494/F3Approved

What was proposed

The application sought to turn an existing natural grass area into a synthetic PlayZone with three-metre fencing and floodlighting.

“Permission is sought for Change of use of existing natural grass area to a synthetic PlayZone with 3m fencing and floodlighting.”

Officer report

Planning history

There was no relevant planning history for the application.

“None relevant to the current application.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended permission because the facility would improve recreation, respect the site and surroundings, and avoid significant amenity or highway harm.

“The application site is situated to the south of the existing community facility and is within a predominantly residential area, in within walking distance of a number of residential properties. The site is therefore considered to be in a sustainable location.”

“The proposal is suitable in relation to the proportions, massing, height, size, scale, materials and detailed design features and the application would respect the character of the site and its surroundings. The application accords with part j of policy SD4 of the Redcar and Cleveland Local Plan.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Sport England raised no objection, environmental protection raised no contamination objection, and nuisance advice addressed lighting, noise and operating hours.

“Conclusion Further to the above assessment, Sport England does not wish to raise an objection to this application.”

“In terms of noise, I note the development is in close proximity to neighbouring properties whose amenity could be adversely affected by construction noise associated with the development. Also having reviewed the noise assessment submitted I note that it recommends a noise management plan be implemented as part of the development to minimise the effect on neighbour amenity.”

Officer report

Public representations

The consultation produced no representations from the public.

“The application has been advertised by means of a site notice and neighbour notification letters.”

“As a result of the consultation period no representations have been received.”

Officer report

Members’ debate

Members discussed the value of sports facilities, winter training, other PlayZones, management of the pitch and the biodiversity condition.

“Members debated the application and made the following comments:-”

“These sports facilities support thousands of people each year; • There were a number of playzones being developed across the Borough; • The more people involved in sport the better; • Would the other playzone applications be coming before committee; • This would be a great addition to the club; • The facility would provide a facility to train all winter; • Was it an extension to the Boys Club and would they be managing the pitch?; • Did the HMMP have to be submitted before…”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

Members granted deemed consent subject to conditions controlling the implementation, approved plans and biodiversity management and monitoring.

“Following the debate Members resolved to grant deemed consent subject to the following conditions:-”

“3.The development shall not commence until a [Habitat Management and Monitoring Plan (the HMMP)], prepared in accordance with the approved Biodiversity Gain Plan has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority and including:”

Minutes

Sources

  • Redcar And Cleveland Regulatory Committee minutes, 25 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Redcar And Cleveland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 25 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)