Eight-person HMO at 68 Montgomerie Road, Southsea

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Portsmouth Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026.

25/01506/FULRefusedAgainst officer advice

The site and surroundings

The property is in a terraced Victorian residential street, close to local centres, Fratton station, buses, shops, services and the city centre.

“The site is approximately 300m from Fratton Local Centre, where there are a range of shops, leisure, employment and services, and local buses, and 100m from Fawcett Road…”

Officer report

Consultation and objections

Highways raised no objection subject to cycle storage, while seven representations opposed the scheme, including over parking, amenity, services and HMO concentration.

“Montgomerie Road is a residential road with bus stops and local amenities in close proximity along Winston Churchill Road and Victoria Road North. It is not considered that size of development would lead to a material impact to the function of the highway or result in any unacceptable safety impact. There may be increase instances of vehicles hunting for space in the vicinity, this is however an issue of residential amenity for your consideration of the application.”

“Loss of services such as water, sewerage, electricity, gas etc. • Pressure on public facilities such as Hospitals, GPs, Dentists, etc • Parking concerns • Environmental and amenity loss • Applications being considered on a case by case basis, instead of their cumulative impact • Loss of community character • Cycle storage is not evidenced as a mitigation for increased car use • Council must adopt a management plan for HMOs and their use…”

Officer report

What members debated

Members discussed the 10% HMO threshold, the high local concentration, consistency with other refusals and the adequacy of outdoor space.

“Members' Comments In discussion, members made the following comments:”

“To be consistent, if other applications today were refused for breaching the 10% limit, then the application should also be refused. Under the emerging Local Plan members could give moderate weight to the emerging Local Plan but there was such a high concentration of HMOs in the area, for example, seven HMOs next to each other, the harm outweighed the benefits. The HMO threshold in the area, known locally as the "ladder of roads", was exceeded by about 60 to 70%.”

Minutes

The committee decision

The committee resolved to refuse the application because it would over-intensify development, provide inadequate outdoor space, breach emerging HMO policy and lack SPA mitigation.

“RESOLVED that the application be refused for the following reasons - the proposal would constitute over-intensification of development by increasing the number of occupants from five to eight; outdoor space is inadequate for the proposed number of occupants; it would not satisfy the policy of the emerging Local Plan on increasing occupancy in areas already over the 10% threshold for HMOs; it would not meet the policy on mitigation for Special Protection Areas.”

Minutes

Officers’ proposed safeguards

The officer recommendation included a legal agreement for Solent protection mitigation and conditions covering plans, cycles, extension completion, water efficiency and waste storage.

“That planning permission be granted, subject to satisfactory completion of a legal agreement to secure:”

“(a) the mitigation of the impact of the proposed residential development on Solent Special Protection Areas (recreational disturbance and nitrates) by securing the payment of a financial contribution…”

Officer report

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

  1. the proposal would constitute over-intensification of development by increasing the number of occupants from five to eight; outdoor space is inadequate for the proposed number of occupants; it would not satisfy the policy of the emerging Local Plan on increasing occupancy in areas already over the 10% threshold for HMOs; it would not meet the policy on mitigation for Special Protection Areas. The
Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Portsmouth Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Portsmouth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Portsmouth
Date
Wednesday 9 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

94 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 23 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →