Sunroom and roof terrace alterations at 60A High Street, Portsmouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Portsmouth Planning Committee on 25 Feb 2026.

25/01159/FULRefused

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing the fourth-floor sunroom, enlarging the roof terrace with a glass balustrade, and making internal alterations including a replacement lift.

“FUL: ALTERATIONS TO FOURTH FLOOR SUNROOM INCLUDING ENLARGED ROOF TERRACE WITH GLAZED BALUSTRADE; INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO FLOOR LAYOUT AND REPLACEMENT INTERNAL LIFT”

“LBC: EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO FOURTH FLOOR SUNROOM INCLUDING ENLARGED ROOF TERRACE WITH GLAZED BALUSTRADE; INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO FLOOR LAYOUT AND REPLACEMENT INTERNAL LIFT”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a Grade II listed four-storey building in Old Portsmouth Conservation Area, visible in long views from nearby streets, the sea wall and Grand Parade.

“The application site is a four storey, with additional sunroom and modest rooftop terrace above, Grade II listed building located on the corner of High Street and Grand Parade. The application site is within Conservation Area 04 - Old Portsmouth. This conservation area was designated in 1969, with some of Portsmouth's oldest and most important heritage assets within the conservation area.”

Officer report

Earlier applications and advice

Earlier schemes were refused, while officers later advised reducing the sunroom’s height and glazing, reducing the terrace, and using plain black metal railings.

“Pre-application advice sought Summer 2025. Officers advised that a reduction in height and glazing area for the sunroom may result in an acceptable solution however materials must be appropriate. The extent of outdoor terrace should be reduced (drawn back form the building edge) and the glass balustrade replaced with plain, black metal railings.”

“23/01393/LBC Refused Listed Building Consent under Delegated Powers November 2024: The proposed development is considered, by reason of its prominent location, additional footprint and height, and glass construction and finish, to represent an incongruous and harmful addition to the listed building. There is no public benefit resulting from the development.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the glass balustrade and fibre-cement cladding would harm the listed building and conservation area, with no public benefit to outweigh that harm.

“Glass balustrade: Officers at Pre-Application stage recommended painted black metal balustrade railings would be a more appropriate solution given the context of the application site. The extended terrace area would extend to the edge of the existing roof, giving it great prominence which would be visible from Oyster Street, High Street, Broad Street, Grand Parade, and the sea wall.”

“Sunroom materials. These are proposed to be a sky-grey composite cladding (specifically RAL 7047). Clarification from the applicant has confirmed this would be a fibre-cement cladding. This is contrary to the Local Planning Authority's pre-application advice that the materials should be appropriate to a Listed Building, and so be vertical timber boards, painted white.”

Officer report

What people said

A neighbour objected to the design, visual impact, terrace appearance and privacy, while Friends of Old Portsmouth Association supported replacing the existing sunroom.

“Letters to adjoining properties were sent on 16.10.2025. A site notice was erected outside the site on 16.10.2025. 6.2 2 representations have been received in respect of the proposals (all on FUL application, no representations on LBC application). 1 objects to the scheme (a neighbour). 1 is in support (Friends Of Old Portsmouth Association)”

“The following objections were made to the scheme; • Poor quality of the proposal's contemporary appearance in regard to built form, particularly with regard to the Listed Status of the host building and potential president for other works (officer note all works are considered on their own merit) • Lack of subservience and overbearing visual impact, especially in regard to other proposals nearby • Unsightly appearance of sun terrace and associated seating etc.”

Officer report

Effects on neighbours and heritage

The enlarged terrace was not considered to cause an unreasonable privacy loss, but the balustrade and cladding were considered harmful to heritage assets.

“The application site's existing terrace already overlooks the nearest buildings to the south-east, the first being 4 Quay Gate House next door, the second being next-door- but-one at 1 Grand Parade. The proposed extended terrace area would increase overlooking of the rooftop terrace at 4 Quay Gate House, and introduce overlooking of the rooftop terrace at 1 Grand Parade.”

“The new and enlarged window on the south west (front) elevation of the application site would look towards the opposite property some 35m away at 18-22 Grand Parade (Fontenoy House), however this building opposite is three storeys tall and therefore the impact of overlooking, combined with distance and the set back of the sun room, would not result in a harmful effect on neighbour amenity by means of loss of privacy or change in outlook.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

Planning permission was refused because the proposal would harm the listed building and Old Portsmouth Conservation Area, causing less than substantial harm without public benefit.

“25/01159/FUL planning permission be refused for the following reasons: The proposed development was considered, by reason of the glass balustrade's prominent location and incongruous material, and the sunroom cladding finish, to represent a harmful addition to the listed building, which would not preserve or enhance the character or appearance of Conservation Area 04 - Old Portsmouth - nor the listed application property. The proposals…”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

  1. The proposed development was considered, by reason of the glass balustrade's prominent location and incongruous material, and the sunroom cladding finish, to represent a harmful addition to the listed building, which would not preserve or enhance the character or appearance of Conservation Area 04 - Old Portsmouth - nor the listed application property. The proposals 5 would result in 'less than su
Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Portsmouth Planning Committee minutes, 25 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Portsmouth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Portsmouth
Date
Wednesday 25 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

54 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 12 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →