Six-person HMO at 1 Munster Road, Portsmouth
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Portsmouth Planning Committee on 17 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought flexible use of the house as either a dwelling or a six-bedroom, six-person house in multiple occupation.
“The proposal is for the change of use of the property from a dwellinghouse (Class C3) to purposes falling within C3 or C4 (house in multiple occupation). The intended occupation is 6 persons in 6 bedrooms.”
“The proposal is for the change of use of the property from a dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a dwellinghouse (Class C3) or House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Class C4). If granted, this would allow the applicant to use the property flexibly as either a C4 HMO or a C3 dwellinghouse for a period of up to 10 years under the rights granted under Class V, Part 3 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
A 1988 proposal for two flats was refused, while a 2025 application was refused for insufficient parking and is at appeal.
“App No - A*27194/B, CONVERSION OF HOUSE TO FORM TWO SELF-CONTAINED FLATS Decision - Refused - Date - 29/11/1988”
“App No - 25/00680/FUL Decision - Committee Refusal on grounds of insufficient parking, currently at appeal. Date - 25.09.2025”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended conditional permission, concluding that the proposal was acceptable and complied with relevant planning policies.
“Having regard to all material planning considerations and representations it is concluded that the proposed change of use is acceptable and would be in accordance with the relevant policies of the Portsmouth Plan (2012), the HMO SPD, the objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2024) and the emerging Portsmouth Local Plan (2024).”
“Time Limit The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission.”
Officer report
Main planning issues
The assessment considered community balance, accommodation standards, neighbours, parking, waste, protected areas, infrastructure contributions and other matters.
“The main issues for consideration in the determination of the applications include the following:”
“The principle of development; • The standard of accommodation; • Impact on neighbouring living conditions; • Highways and Parking; • Waste; • Impact upon the Solent Protection Areas; • Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL); • Any other matters raised; and • Human Rights.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Highways raised no objection to highway safety, and private sector housing found suitable living space, subject to likely licensing.
“Munster Road is a residential road with bus stops and local amenities in close proximity along London Road. The proposed application seeks to convert an existing residential unit (C3) to an HMO residential unit (C4). It is not considered that size of development would lead to a material impact to the function of the highway or result in any unacceptable safety impact.”
“No objection. There is suitable living space for the proposed number of occupants. The property would likely require a licence under Part 2, Housing Act 2004.”
Officer report
Objections from residents
Nine objections raised concerns about parking, disturbance, waste, extensions, services, community character, room sizes, antisocial behaviour and delivery safety.
“Parking pressure, with parking shortages on Munster Road and the surrounds and the concerns that up to 14 occupants could all bring vehicles. No admission from PCC that HMO's impact parking concerns • Amenity concerns through the increase in noise and disturbance. Construction disturbances. Environmental Health concerns (vermin, pollution etc) • Waste issues through fly tipping and overflowing bins, litter etc • Overdevelopment of the site through the large extensions.”
“The PCS20 policy does not protect community character and the area already exceeds acceptable density.”
Officer report
Members’ debate
Some members saw significant improvement and no reason to refuse, while others feared parking pressure would harm residential amenity.
“Members' Questions In response to questions, the following information was clarified by the Planning Officer: • The fact that there is an appeal currently with the Planning Inspectorate for this property should not influence the committee’s decision today; the application must be determined on its own merits. If the appeal is allowed as well as this application, the applicant would have two consents and could implement either.”
“Members’ Comments • Some members felt that the proposal represented a significant improvement compared to the previous application and saw no reason for refusal. • Other members expressed concerns about the potential strain on parking should the application be approved, believing this could adversely affect residential amenity and therefore should be refused.”
Minutes
The committee vote
The committee resolved to grant conditional planning permission in line with the officer recommendation.
“RESOLVED that conditional planning permission be granted as per the officer recommendation.”
Minutes
Permission conditions
The permission required approved plans, four bicycle spaces, completed extensions and facilities for storing waste and recyclable materials.
“Approved Plans Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the permission hereby granted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved drawings: - Location Plan - PG.1068.25.4 - Proposed Floor Plans and Elevations, Sections…”
“Waste Storage Prior to the first occupation of the property as a House in Multiple Occupation; refuse and recyclable materials storage facilities shall be provided at the site and shall thereafter be retained for the continued use by the occupants.”
Officer report
The members' reasons
“Some members felt that the proposal represented a significant improvement compared to the previous application and saw no reason for refusal.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Portsmouth Planning Committee minutes, 17 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Portsmouth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Portsmouth Planning Committee
- Council
- Portsmouth
- Date
- Wednesday 17 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Portsmouth committee decisions →
This committee's year
38 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 11 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.