Seven-person HMO at 57 New Road East, Portsmouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Portsmouth Planning Committee on 12 Nov 2025.

25/00906/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application sought to change the dwelling into a seven-bedroom, seven-person house in multiple occupation, with extensions, a bike store and bin area.

“CHANGE OF USE FROM DWELLINGHOUSE (CLASS C3) TO 7-BEDROOM/ 7-PERSON HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION (SUI GENERIS)”

“25/00906/FUL | CHANGE OF USE FROM DWELLINGHOUSE (CLASS C3) TO 7-BEDROOM/ 7-PERSON HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION (SUI GENERIS) | 57 NEW ROAD EAST PORTSMOUTH PO2 7RS”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a two-storey mid-terrace house with a front forecourt and rear garden, near shops, services, buses and unrestricted parking.

“The application site relates to a two-storey mid-terrace dwelling located on northern side of New Road East, east of its junction with Percival Road. The property is set back from the street by a short front forecourt and benefits from a private rear garden…”

“The site is approximately 500m from the Copnor Road (south) Local Centre, where there are a range of shops, leisure, employment and services, and local buses. Ocean Retail Park is located a 1km to the north-east. To the south of the site (80m) is Kingston Cemetery. Parking in the area is unrestricted.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers concluded that the proposal was acceptable and recommended conditional permission, subject to an agreement securing mitigation for Solent protection areas.

“RECOMMENDATION I - That delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Director of Planning & Economic Growth to Grant Conditional Permission subject to satisfactory completion of a legal agreement to secure:”

“(a) the mitigation of the impact of the proposed residential development on Solent Special Protection Areas (recreational disturbance and nitrates) by securing the payment of a financial contribution and relevant conditions (below);”

Officer report

Objections received

Twelve objections and a 242-signature petition raised concerns including parking, noise, amenity, waste, overlooking, community impact and loss of a family home.

“Number of HMOs and flats within the street; • Noise and disturbance from the building works; • Overlooking of neighbouring property; • Impact on the local community; • Loss of family dwelling; • Impact on parking; • Impact on neighbouring amenity; • Waste storage and collection concerns; • Impact on water supply and local services; • Loss of light from the roof works; • Increase noise from intensity of occupation (comings and goings etc); • Queries over the size of the…”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee granted delegated authority for conditional permission, subject to a legal agreement and authority to refuse if it was not completed within one month.

“Delegated authority was granted to the Assistant Director of Planning & Economic Growth to grant conditional permission subject to satisfactory completion of a legal agreement to secure: (a) The mitigation of the impact of the proposed residential development on Solent Special Protection Areas (recreational disturbance and nitrates) by securing the payment of a financial contribution and relevant conditions…”

“Delegated authority was granted to the Assistant Director of Planning & Economic Growth to refuse planning permission if a legal agreement has not been satisfactorily agreed within one month of the date of this resolution.”

Minutes

Main conditions

The proposed conditions covered time limits, approved plans, cycle storage, completion of extensions, water efficiency and waste storage.

“Approved Plans Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the permission hereby granted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved drawings: - Location Plan - TQRQM25211084405963; - Block Plan - TQRQM252110845066845; and - Proposed Plan and Elevations - PG.1092.25.2 Rev C.”

“Water Efficiency The proposal hereby permitted shall not (unless otherwise agreed in writing with the LPA) be occupied until written documentary evidence has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority demonstrating that the development has achieved a maximum water use of 110 litres per person per day as defined in paragraph 36(2)b of the Building…”

Officer report

The members' reasons

“Members' Comments Members noted that the usual plans on recent developments were for all bedrooms to have ensuite bathrooms so this application was a little disappointing and they hoped that the rent asked for would reflect that it was not quite up to the standard the planning committee was used to seeing.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Portsmouth Planning Committee minutes, 12 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Portsmouth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Portsmouth
Date
Wednesday 12 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

28 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 9 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →