Rear extension and alterations at 4 Cundy Close, Plymouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Plymouth Planning Committee on 30 Oct 2025.

25/00860/FULApproved

What was proposed

A rear extension would replace the conservatory, alongside re-rendering, a replacement garage door, new windows, doors, guttering and fascias.

“Proposal Description The proposals seek to construct a rear extension replacing an existing conservatory. The extension will be a single storey dual-pitched structure with a concrete tiled roof and finished in white painted render. The extension covers a floor area of approximately 5.7m by 5.3m, with a height to the eaves of 2.4m and a height to the ridge of 4.5m.”

“The proposals also include other minor alterations to the property consisting of the re-rendering of the external elevations, replacement garage door, replacement grey upvc windows and doors and replacement guttering and fascias.”

Officer report

The site

The two-storey detached house has a rear garden backing onto a golf club and lies in a critical drainage area and flood zone 1.

“Description of Site 4 Cundy Close is a two-storey detached dwelling located in a residential area in the ward of Plympton St Mary. The principal elevation of the property faces south fronting Cundy Close and the property benefits from a well-proportioned rear garden which backs onto Boringdon Park Golf Club to the north.”

“The site lies within a critical drainage area and flood zone 1. There are no designated heritage assets in close proximity to the site.”

Officer report

Earlier site history

An earlier rear conservatory was recorded as development that did not require planning permission, and no pre-application enquiry was submitted.

“Pre-application Enquiry There was no pre-application enquiry submitted prior to the application.”

“Relevant Planning History 05/00899/PRDEV: Rear conservatory (Planning Permission not required)”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended conditional approval because the proposal accorded with policy and would not harm neighbouring amenity or the area’s character.

“Conclusions and Reasons for Decision Officers have taken account of the NPPF and S38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and concluded that the development accords with policy and national guidance (specifically JLP Policies DEV1 and DEV20) and will not result in harm to neighbouring amenity or the character and appearance of the area. The proposal is therefore recommended for conditional approval.”

“Recommendation In respect of the application dated 25.07.2025 it is recommended to Grant Conditionally.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The neighbourhood forum did not respond, while the natural infrastructure team raised no principle objection and recommended two bird boxes.

“Consultation Responses Plympton St Mary Neighbourhood Forum were consulted but did not provide a response within the given consultation period.”

“Natural Infrastructure: The Natural Infrastructure Planning team do not hold an in-principle objection to the proposal; however, a condition to secure the installation of bird boxes is recommended.”

Officer report

The decision

The committee granted the application conditionally as set out in the report.

“The Committee agreed to grant the application conditionally, as set out in the report:”

Minutes

Conditions attached

The permission requires approved plans, commencement within three years and two bird boxes installed before the extension is occupied.

“The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years beginning from the date of this permission.”

“Prior to the occupation of the extension hereby permitted two bird boxes shall be installed within the fabric of the building. Plans for the specification and locations of these within the building are to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the bird boxes shall be retained and maintained as such thereafter.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Plymouth Planning Committee minutes, 30 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Plymouth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Plymouth
Date
Thursday 30 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
12 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →