Distillery conversion at Glencarse Stud Farm, Glencarse, Perth
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Perth Planning and Placemaking Committee on 13 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to partly change an artificial insemination centre into a distillery using existing buildings with minor alterations.
“The site, comprising of two existing buildings, is located at the southern end of the hamlet of Cottown. It is situated adjacent to Cottown House and to the south-east of Oakdene House. The two existing buildings currently have planning permission for use as an artificial insemination centre (99/01630/REM).”
“The proposal is for a change of use and minor alterations to form a distillery. The former stables building would be repurposed for the distillation process, while the former artificial insemination centre and associated offices would primarily function as a bonded warehouse. A portion of the existing offices are currently in use as short-term let accommodation.”
Officer report
The site and access
The site contains two existing buildings within the Cottown settlement boundary and would use a shared private access from the C484.
“The vehicle access to the public road network (C484) for the site will be via an existing and privately shared vehicle access (Cottown Road). A right of way (44/5) runs partially along the private access track and on the eastern edge of the wider site.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the proposal supported rural business, reused vacant buildings, created a new rural business and complied with the Development Plan.
“NPF4 Policy 29 (Rural Development) seeks to encourage rural economic activity innovation and diversification. The policy supports proposals that contribute to the viability, sustainability and diversity of rural communities and rural economy will be supported, this includes the diversification of existing businesses, production and processing facilities for local produce and the reuse of brownfield land.”
“NPF4 Policy 9 (Brownfield, Vacant and Derelict Land and Empty Buildings) states that development proposals for the reuse of existing buildings will be supported, taking into account their suitability for conversion to other uses. Given the need to conserve embodied energy, demolition will be regarded as the least preferred option.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Transportation and Environmental Health raised no objections subject to conditions, while contaminated land officers also raised no objection.
“Environmental Health (Noise Odour): No objection subject to conditions relating to plant noise, noise from operations limits, servicing and deliveries hours, external lighting, mitigation measures outlined within Odour Impact Assessment compliance, no odours shall be discernible on boundary with nearest residential property, the submission of an Operational Management Plan (Noise and Odour), noise and odour complaints procedures.”
“Environmental Health (Contaminated Land): No objection.”
Officer report
Objections from residents
Seven objections raised concerns about traffic, road safety, drainage, biodiversity, land use, residential amenity, noise, odour and equipment already being moved onsite.
“Road safety concerns • Increase in traffic/vehicular movements on shared access track & unsuitability of track for HGV vehicles • Drainage and flooding impacts • Biodiversity and ecology impacts • Inappropriate land use for rural/residential area • Impact on residential amenity • Nosie and odour impacts • Unauthorised works (distillery equipment has already been installed).”
Officer report
Who spoke
An objector addressed the committee and answered members’ questions, while the report was introduced by the planning service manager.
Committee discussion
Members considered motions to grant permission, including changes to the core-path condition and a proposed enhanced access-road standard.
“Grant, in terms of Report 26/126, with the amendment to condition 2 and an additional condition requiring that the access road be brought up to an enhanced standard.”
“Grant, subject to the following terms, conditions (including the reworded condition 2) and informatives:”
Minutes
Sources
- Perth Planning and Placemaking Committee minutes, 13 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Perth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Perth
- Date
- Wednesday 13 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Perth committee decisions →
This committee's year
39 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.