36 ground-mounted solar panels at Field Barn Cottage, Wood Norton, Dereham
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by North Norfolk Development Committee on 18 Sept 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed 36 ground-mounted solar panels, up to 1.5 metres high, beside the western boundary of the property’s curtilage.
“WOOD NORTON – PF/25/1192 - Installation of 36 ground mounted solar panels. The panels will be mounted on a frame system and max height of 1.5m. They are to be mounted alongside the western boundary of our curtilage 2m away from the boundary at Field Barn Cottage, Wings Lane, Wood Norton, Dereham, Norfolk, NR20 5DH”
“Proposal The application proposes the installation of 36 ground mounted solar panels. The panels will be mounted on a frame system and with a maximum height of 1.5 metres. They are to be sited alongside the western boundary of the property’s curtilage, 2 metres away from it.”
Officer report
The site
The panels would serve the host dwelling in the countryside, beside agricultural fields, with a dwelling to the west and access from Wings Lane.
“The site lies within the Countryside for the purposes of the Core Strategy’s spatial strategy Grade 3 Agricultural Land Classification Landscape Character Assessment – within the Tributary Farmland landscape type…”
“Site Description The proposed ground mounted solar panels would be sited on land associated with Field Barn Cottage and would serve the host dwelling. The application site is situated within an area designated as Countryside for the purposes of the adopted North Norfolk Core Strategy. The site is adjoined by agricultural fields to the north, east and south. There is a dwelling situated to the west. The site is accessed off Wings Lane to the South from Foulsham Road.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal complied with relevant policies and would have renewable energy and carbon reduction benefits.
“Relevant Core Strategy policies are supportive of this type of development, and it is considered that the proposal will not result in any significant adverse effects for the reasons stated above. The proposed development complies with all relevant policies and would have benefits in terms of renewable energy generation and carbon reduction in terms of climate change.”
“APPROVAL subject to conditions to cover the following matters: • Time Limit for commencement (3 years) • Development in accordance with the approved plans • Removal of equipment when no longer required • BNG implementation condition Final wording of conditions and any others considered to be necessary to be delegated to the Assistant Director – Planning.”
Officer report
Main effects considered
Officers found no significant landscape, residential amenity or highway harm, and considered biodiversity gains could be secured by conditions.
“Principle of development 2. Effect on landscape 3. Effect on residential amenity 4. Whether the proposed development would have any effect on highway safety 5. Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)”
“the surrounding landscape, townscape and historical features / areas; • residential amenity; • highway safety and; • biodiversity…”
Officer report
Consultation and public views
The parish council made no comment, the landscape consultee raised no objection subject to a biodiversity condition, and no representations were received.
“Wood Norton Parish Council: No comments received to date.”
“North Norfolk District Council Landscape: No objection subject to the statutory BNG implementation condition.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A planning officer presented the report, while the local member said neither he nor the parish council objected and the panels were not obtrusive.
Committee debate
A member proposed approval and another member seconded the recommendation.
“Cllr Patterson proposed and Cllr Ringer seconded the recommendation for approval.”
Minutes
The vote
The committee unanimously approved the application.
“IT WAS RESOLVED unanimously to approve the application subject to conditions including a 3 year time limit for commencement, development in accordance with approved plans, removal of equipment when no longer required and a BNG implementation condition. The wording of conditions and any others considered to be necessary, to be delegated to the Assistant Director for Planning.”
Minutes
Sources
- North Norfolk Development Committee minutes, 18 September 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of North Norfolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- North Norfolk Development Committee
- Council
- North Norfolk
- Date
- Thursday 18 September 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- North Norfolk committee decisions →
This committee's year
23 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 6 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.