Two-storey front extension at The Lodge, 8 Carr Lane, Bonby

“CONSTRAINTS The site comprises an existing residential property outside the defined development limits, within flood zone 1. It is not within a conservation area but there is a listed building approximately 40m to the north-west of the site. All the trees to the front of the house are subject to a group TPO.”

“At ground floor, the extension would provide additional space for a utility room, boot room and enlarged hallway, whilst at first floor it would accommodate a reading nook and walk-in wardrobe. The front (south) elevation of the extension is proposed to be finished in render, whereas the existing dwelling is constructed of red brick throughout.”

“Trees: The tree officer has confirmed that all trees to the front of the property are protected by a group tree preservation order (TPO). It is advised that no construction materials or operations should take place beneath the tree canopies or within their root protection areas. The proposed works to the dwelling itself are not expected to impact the trees, subject to appropriate protection measures being put in place.”

“…volume of the dwelling would increase to approximately 730–740m3, representing a volume increase of around 35–40% above the original dwelling, thereby exceeding the 20% increase in volume for residential extensions set out within policy RD10.”

“Design and impact on the character and appearance of the area Policies CS5, DS5, RD2 and RD10 require extensions in rural areas to remain proportionate to the host dwelling, ensure the original building remains the dominant element and avoid development that would detract from the character of the dwelling or the wider countryside. In addition, SPG1 advises that extensions should be subordinate in scale and appear as a natural addition to the dwelling.”

“PA/2025/1469 - PLANNING PERMISSION TO ERECT A TWO-STOREY FRONT EXTENSION WITH ASSOCIATED WORKS. LOCATION: THE LODGE, 8 CARR LANE, BONBY, DN20 0PX - Councillor C Sherwood believed that the extension had been significantly reduced in size and would not adversely affect neighbouring properties.”

“It was then moved by Councillor C Sherwood and seconded by Councillor C Ross –”

“That planning permission be granted in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Planning Officers report.”