Two agricultural buildings at Hatch Pen, The Joint, Reed, Royston

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by North Hertfordshire Planning Control Committee on 11 Dec 2025.

25/01707/FPApproved

What was proposed

The application sought two open-sided agricultural straw storage buildings and retention of an excavated area.

“Erection of two proposed agricultural buildings and retention of extended excavated area…”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The farmyard lies in open countryside, with existing buildings set below surrounding land and screened by established trees.

“Hatchpen farmyard complex lies on the north side of The Joint, in a position set well back off the lane with an access track leading down to the existing farmyard. The land levels fall to north and east, with the existing farm buildings set on a low point in the landscape with established tree planting screening the buildings in views in the locality. The three buildings and land excavation approved under application 21/01742/FP has been…”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Previous permissions included three agricultural buildings, which have been built beside the proposed buildings.

“There is a moderate planning history for the site including a detached farmhouse in 1991, the game keeper’s cottage and associated shoot accommodation in 2008 and in 2020 an application for a dedicated farm office building with car parking. This has not been constructed on site.”

“More specifically to this proposal, planning permission was granted for granted planning permission for the erection of three agricultural buildings under application reference 21/01742/FP. These buildings have been constructed on site and neighbour the location for the proposed buildings the subject of this application.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the barns support the existing rural business and would be grouped, designed and screened to limit landscape harm.

“The Local Plan supports this policy aim, with Policy CGB1 which states that in the Rural Area beyond the Green Belt planning permission will be granted if (criteria c) the proposal is strictly necessary for the needs of agriculture and forestry. As set out above these straw barns are needed to support the applicant’s existing straw business to reduce the amount of straw getting ruined by rain and become wastage.”

“Local Plan Policy NE2 requires for new development to respect the sensitivities of the relevant landscape and to not cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area or the landscape character area in which the site is located, taking account of any suitable mitigation.”

Officer report

What consultees said

The parish council did not object but raised landscape and HGV route concerns; consultees otherwise raised no objection or comment, and no third-party replies were received.

“Reed Parish Council – no objection but state that they want the visual impact of the proposal in the landscape considered and raise a suggestion that the farm stops HGV movements from the access on The Joint and uses the access to the north onto the A10. This is due to concerns that traffic along The Joint will increase with the new housing to be built in Barkway.”

“The application was advertised with site and press notices. No third party replies have been received at the time of writing this report.”

Officer report

Questions and debate

Members asked about possible residential conversion and the open-sided design, while a councillor said there would be no visual impact.

“If the applicant wished to convert the agricultural buildings into residential dwellings, they would have to wait at least ten years after they were constructed before submitting a suitable application for the Council to consider. • The buildings would be open sided to allow for the use of a forklift to stack hay bales as an enclosed building would not accommodate this.”

“As part of the debate, Councillor Ruth Brown highlighted that there would no visual impact from this application on the surrounding area and therefore, there was no reason to refuse it.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee granted planning permission subject to the conditions set out in the officer report.

“Councillor Emma Fernandes proposed to grant permission and this was seconded by Councillor Martin Prescott.”

“RESOLVED: That application 25/01707/FP be GRANTED planning permission subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Development and Conservation Manager.”

Minutes

Sources

  • North Hertfordshire Planning Control Committee minutes, 11 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of North Hertfordshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 11 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →