Two homes at Land Adjacent Cartref, Corkhill Lane, Normanton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Newark And Sherwood Planning Committee on 15 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought permission in principle for two homes, with detailed design and other matters reserved for a later technical consent stage.
“25/01827/PIP - Application for permission in principle for a residential development of a minimum of 2 dwellings and a maximum of 5 dwellings is currently subject to an application for ‘Permission in Principle’. The application is currently under consideration and will also be presented to Planning Committee on 15 th January 2026.”
“The application seeks Permission in Principle (the first of a 2-stage process) for residential development of 2 dwellings. No specific details are required at this stage. Permission in Principle requires only the location, the land use, and the amount of development to be assessed. If residential development (as is the case in this application), the description must specify the minimum and maximum number of dwellings proposed.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a 0.24-hectare undeveloped agricultural parcel beside Corkhill Lane, bordered by hedgerows and near existing homes.
“The Site 1.1 The site (outlined in red) comprises of a square parcel of undeveloped agricultural land measuring 0.24 hectares in area, fronting onto Corkhill Lane to the immediate northwest of the village of Normanton. The surrounding area otherwise is predominantly fields. The site is bounded by hedgerows.”
“The entrance to the site and parts of the site are at risk of surface water flooding at varying levels ranging from low to medium risk with predominantly low/medium risk at the site entrance and high risk to the northwestern portion of the site boundary.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because two homes were considered acceptable in location, land use and amount, subject to technical details and mitigation.
“Legal Advisor will be present at the meeting to assist on any legal points which may arise during consideration of the application. Conclusion 9.1. The purpose of this application is to assess the acceptability of the proposal on the application site, in relation to location, land use, and amount of development, in principle only. Any other issues should be assessed at Technical Details stage.”
“It is therefore recommended that unconditional Permission in Principle is approved.”
Officer report
Who spoke
The agent spoke in support of the application, and members received a presentation from the senior planning officer.
Members’ discussion
Members considered the proposal acceptable because two houses would not affect the village’s infrastructure.
“Members considered the application acceptable as the proposal was for two houses which would not impact on the infrastructure of the village.”
Minutes
The vote and decision
Members unanimously approved permission in principle as set out in the report.
“AGREED (unanimously) that Permission in Principle is Approved, as contained within the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Newark And Sherwood Planning Committee minutes, 15 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Newark And Sherwood's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Newark And Sherwood
- Date
- Thursday 15 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Newark And Sherwood committee decisions →
This committee's year
27 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 6 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.