Six-bed HMO conversion at 27 Ena Avenue, Neath

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Neath Planning Committee on 18 Nov 2025.

P2025/0370RefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought to convert a dwelling into a six-bedroom HMO, with roof, window, internal, storage and garden works.

“This application seeks full planning permission for the change of use of 27 Ena Avenue from a dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a 6-bedroom House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Use Class C4), the works for which would include internal alterations, fenestration alterations, the construction of a rear dormer extension and the installation of two no. roof lights within the principal roof slope.”

“The proposed rear dormer extension would have a flat roof design and would be set down from the main ridge level and set back from the eaves of the main dwellinghouse. The dormer would measure 5.45m in width, 2.55m in height and would project out a maximum depth of 3.65m beyond the existing rear roof slope. The two proposed roof light windows would protrude approximately 13cm beyond the principal roof slope of the application property.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a mid-terrace four-bedroom house in a residential area, with a rear lane, garage, garden and nearby mixed uses.

“The application site is located at 27 Ena Avenue, Neath. The site comprises of a mid- terrace, two-storey, four-bedroom dwellinghouse. The property currently benefits from an enclosed rear garden area, which accommodates an existing detached garage and WC structure, with a small garden area situated to the front.”

“The property is bound on either side by residential properties and fronts onto the residential highway named Ena Avenue. To the rear of the site runs a shared access…”

Officer report

Earlier history and changes

The site previously received a certificate for a garage, while amended plans reduced the proposed occupancy from seven to six people.

“Following the initial consultation period, the agent and applicant were made aware of the consultation responses received to date and subsequently opted to submit amended plans reducing the number of occupiers proposed from seven to six and relocating the proposed cycle and bin storage areas within the existing garage structure. The applicant also opted to submit a Flood Consequences Assessment and a Preliminary Bat Assessment.”

“N1982/0735 Section 53 Garage, certificate issued 02-FEB-83.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval, considering the proposal acceptable in principle and finding no unacceptable effect on visual amenity, neighbours, highways, biodiversity, flooding, drainage or waste.

“It is considered that the proposal represents an appropriate form of development that would have no unacceptable impact on the visual amenity of the area, the amenities of neighbouring residents, highway safety, biodiversity, drainage flood risk, and waste. Accordingly, the proposed development is in accordance with Policies SP3, SP15, SP16, SP20, SP21, SC1, EN6, EN7, EN8, TR2 and BE1 of the Neath Port Talbot Local Development Plan.”

“It is further considered that the decision complies with Future Wales - the National Plan 2040, specifically Policies 2 (Shaping Urban Growth and Regeneration – Strategic Placemaking), 7 (Delivering Affordable Homes), 8 (Flooding) & 9 (Resilient Ecological Networks and Green Infrastructure), and the Council’s well-being objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Most technical consultees raised no objection, while the town council strongly objected over traffic, parking, noise, waste, density and community effects.

“Neath Town Council - Vehemently object to the development based on the following issues: To change this single occupancy residence into a multiple occupancy residence would severely impact this locality, the neighbourhood and its community relationships and harmony residents have with each other. We acknowledge the application has been revised from 7 to 6 residents but this will have little/no change to the original application.”

“The Authority’s Pollution Control Team (Noise) - No objection subject to a condition restricting hours of construction work.”

Officer report

What residents said

Eighty-four individuals objected, alongside a petition signed by 113 people, citing parking, noise, waste, safety, overdevelopment, community balance and other concerns.

“The street in question is a quiet residential area, and residents are understandably worried about the impact this development will have on the character of the area, parking pressures, waste management and noise pollution, and numerous other safety and environmental concerns. While HMOs play a vital role in providing affordable housing, it is essential that they are located in appropriate areas and are balanced against the needs and concerns of the local community.”

“Concerns regarding the marketing of the property. • Development threatens public safety. • Visual impact of dormer extension. • Harmful impact on local residential amenity. • Questions regarding management/funding of development. • Disruption and safety issues caused by building works. • Concerns over misleading or tactically revised information and lack of transparency. • Concern regarding potential damage to adjoining properties.”

Officer report

The committee decision

The committee resolved to refuse the application.

“P2025/0370 - House in Multiple Occupation (HMO), Ena Avenue, Neath RESOLVED: That Application No. P2025/0370 - proposed change of use from dwellinghouse (use class C3) to 6-bed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) (use class C4), at 27 Ena Avenue, Neath, SA11 3AD – be REFUSED on the following grounds:”

Minutes

Why permission was refused

The committee found unacceptable impacts on highway and pedestrian safety, residential amenity and the area’s character through overdevelopment.

“The proposed development would result in unacceptable impacts upon highway and pedestrian safety, due to a lack of off street car parking, contrary to policy TR2 of the Local Development Plan.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

“On the following grounds: 1. The proposed development would result in unacceptable impacts upon highway and pedestrian safety, due to a lack of off street car parking, contrary to policy TR2 of the Local Development Plan. 2. The development would result in unacceptable impacts on residential amenity and the character of the area through overdevelopment of the site, contrary to policy BE1 of the Local Development Plan.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Neath Planning Committee minutes, 18 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Neath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Neath
Date
Tuesday 18 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)