Mole Valley planning committee

Councillor Garry Andrew Graham Stansfield

Member, Development Management Committee

Seen at planning committee from October 2025 to October 2026

  • 67%attendance
  • 26decisions at their meetings

As at 7 October 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Mole Valley’s published minutes, Councillor Garry Andrew Graham Stansfield attended 6 of the 9 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from October 2025 to October 2026. The committee decided 26 applications at those meetings. The minutes we hold do not give each member's vote on them.

Meetings attended
6 of 967%
Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
26
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Declared interests
0
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

The minutes we hold do not give each member's vote at these meetings, so no vote is counted for Stansfield and no voting chart is drawn.

Attendance

67%

6 of 9 meetings whose minutes list them; apologies for 3.

The typical member of this committee attended 89% (the median of 15 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

PresentApologies
20252026

Development Management Committee: 6 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
7 Oct 2026Development Management CommitteePresent
3 Jun 2026Development Management CommitteePresent
29 Apr 2026Development Management CommitteePresent
1 Apr 2026Development Management CommitteePresent
4 Mar 2026Development Management CommitteeApologies
4 Feb 2026Development Management CommitteePresent
7 Jan 2026Development Management CommitteeApologies
5 Nov 2025Development Management CommitteeApologies
1 Oct 2025Development Management CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Stansfield moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

The minutes we hold do not quote this councillor by name.

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from Mole Valley’s published planning committee minutes, 9 meetings from October 2025 to October 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is the one they were elected for, from Democracy Club’s open election results.

Also on this committee

All Mole Valley committee councillors