Restaurant and retail changes at The George, Benover Road, Yalding

Earlier application and appeal

An earlier application with the same description was supported by the committee, but an appeal was dismissed because flooding had not been assessed.

“Section 73 Application for Minor Material Amendment to approved plans condition 2and 6 (to allow for the removal of stairs, existing front doors to be retained and layout amendment) (Retrospective), pursuant to 23/502781/FULL for Change of Use from ground floor Sui Generis (Public House) to Class E restaurant part retail facilities with ancillary Sui Generis use (Takeaway)” (NB description identical to the current application being considered).”

“The appeal Inspector in the decision letter dated 8 April 2025 concluded: • ” ...accords with the requirements of Policy LPRSP14 (B) and LPRENV1 of the Local Plan, which seek to ensure new development conserves, and where possible enhances, the significance of heritage assets and apply a balanced judgement in respect of harm to non-designated heritage assets [inc.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the current proposal was acceptable on local-centre character, heritage, amenity, parking and flooding matters.

“The appeal Inspector considering the non-determination appeal found no issue with the following matters: - Vitality, viability and character of Yalding local centre - Impact on heritage - Residential amenity - Parking…”

“The current application is acceptable in relation to the vitality, viability and character of Yalding local centre, impact on heritage, residential amenity, parking and flooding.”

Officer report

Flooding information

The Environment Agency raised no objection after receiving additional information for the current application.

“In addition, based on additional information submitted with the current application the Environment Agency have confirmed no objection to the current planning application.”

Officer report

Who addressed the committee

Councillor Russell addressed the meeting before leaving, followed by a parish council representative and the applicant.

The committee vote

The committee granted permission by eight votes to three, with one abstention.

“That permission be granted subject to the conditions set out in the report.”

“That the Head of Planning and Economic Development be given delegated powers to be able to settle or amend any necessary planning conditions and/or informatives in line with the matters set out in the recommendation and as resolved by the Planning Committee.”

Minutes