Care home at Land At Marston Road, Frome
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Mendip East on 3 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed demolishing an existing dwelling and building a care home with parking, access changes, landscaping, a substation and related infrastructure.
“Application Details Application Reference Number: 2025/1341/FUL Application Types: Full Planning Permission Extension of Time: Yes - PPA Description: Demolition of building and erection of care home (Class C2), construction of electrical substation, parking, alterations to existing access, landscaping and associated infrastructure.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier applications for an extension and a private double garage and porch were granted.
“048132/004 – Erection of private double garage and porch - Granted…”
Officer report
What people told members
Objectors focused on scale, privacy, outlook, design and care-home need; supporters stressed local demand, accessibility, community benefits and the building’s design.
Members’ discussion
Members discussed bed numbers, local need, neighbour impacts, care-home standards, employment land, the site’s history and the scheme’s economic benefits.
“One Member queried whether a formal viability study had been undertaken for the number of proposed beds. Officers confirmed that no formal viability assessment had been submitted, nor was one required, but discussions with the applicant indicated that the proposed number of beds was necessary for the care home to be viable. • Members asked whether an application could be refused on grounds of over-provision.”
“The scheme provided a 27-metre separation distance to the closest property, with only one window requiring obscure glazing; other facing windows are over 34 metres away. • Internal room sizes and layouts were queried. Officers confirmed that the architect was extremely experienced in care home design and the scheme meets relevant CQC and design standards, including en-suite rooms and access to communal facilities.”
Minutes
The vote and decision
Members approved the application in accordance with the officer recommendation, with 9 votes in favour, 2 against and 1 abstention.
“At the conclusion of the debate, Councillor Ewan Cameron proposed that the application be approved in accordance with the Officer’s recommendation. This proposal was seconded by Councillor Martin Lovell.”
“On being put to the vote the proposal to approve was carried with 9 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 1 abstention.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Members also noted that the scheme would provide around 75 full-time equivalent jobs, with one Member emphasising the economic benefit and inward investment this represents.”
“Some Members noted that care homes are subject to strict CQC design regulations and that modern en-suite provision was significantly better than in many existing local homes.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Mendip East minutes, 3 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Mendip's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Mendip East
- Council
- Mendip
- Date
- Tuesday 3 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 9 for, 2 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Mendip committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.