Home extension and garage at 66 Brompton Farm Road, Strood, Rochester
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 14 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed extensions, a rear garage with storage, a new vehicle crossover and demolition of the existing side garage and conservatory.
“The application seeks permission for the construction of a wraparound part single/ part first floor extension to rear/side; construction of a single storey garage with storage to side of rear garden and change of use of amenity land to vehicle crossover to front of new garage onto Strodes Close, of which would involve the demolition of existing side garage and conservatory.”
“The proposed two storey side extension supports a hipped roof and measures 6.65m in height (5.05m from eaves; 1.0m below primary ridgeline), 2.5m in width and 10.2m in depth (setback 0.7m from principal elevation). From the rear perspective, the proposed two storey aspect projects approx. 3.4m in depth from rear wall of the dwelling, and measures 5.55m in width (setback 2.6m from the inner west side boundary).”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The property is a two-storey semi-detached home beside Strodes Close, with countryside, an Area of Local Landscape Importance and Green Belt beyond its rear boundary.
“Brompton Farm Road is a two-storey, semi-detached property located within the urban area of Strood. To the front, the property supports a mix of soft and hard landscaping with off street parking provision and a recessed garage to the side that extends into the rear garden amenity. To the rear, the property supports a conservatory projection and a private garden amenity with a shed towards the rear northwest boundary.”
“In addition, while No.66 remains within the urban boundary of Strood, the rear north boundary abuts designated countryside as well as an Area of Local Landscape Importance (ALLI) and Metropolitan Green Belt (MGB).”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
A single-storey rear extension was approved with conditions in 1986.
“HIS/98/38539 Proposed single storey rear extension Decision: Approved with Conditions Date: July 1986”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the design, neighbour impacts and highway effects were considered acceptable, subject to conditions.
“The introduction of a dropped kerb along the west elevation of Strodes Close would not appear out of character as one already exists as access alongside its gated character to the immediate farmland, divided only by the aforementioned electricity substation. Just opposite the proposed kerb, are dwellings of Strodes Close that access onto the highway via dropped kerb from east elevation of Strodes Close.”
“Although the proposed dropped kerb would create a secondary access, it would front an unclassified road and as such is not subject to planning outside its impact upon the public amenity land and is to be approved by highways. Within regard to planning consideration, its impact to the local character and residential amenity is considered acceptable.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Southern Water had no objection because flows would remain consistent and its assets would not be affected.
“Southern Water and Highways have also been consulted.”
“Southern Water have made the following comments: Southern Water has determined that the flow rate for the above site will remain consistent, so capacity is not an issue, and no Southern Water assets will be affected. Therefore, Southern Water has no objections to this proposal.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
The committee discussed the application after the planner’s presentation and considered the officer report.
“The Planner presented the application which sought permission for the construction of a wraparound part single/ part first floor extension to rear/side; construction of a single storey garage with storage to side of rear garden and change of use of amenity land to vehicle crossover to front of new garage onto Strodes Close, of which would involve the demolition of existing side garage and conservatory.”
“The Committee discussed the planning application noting the officer presentation and the report.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee approved the application subject to conditions 1 to 5 and the reasons given for approval.
“APPROVED subject to conditions 1 to 5 as set out in the report for the reasons stated in the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Medway Planning Committee minutes, 14 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Medway Planning Committee
- Council
- Medway
- Date
- Wednesday 14 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Medway committee decisions →
This committee's year
35 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.