Rooftop pavilion and terrace at 1 Piccadilly Gardens, Manchester

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Manchester Planning Committee on 28 May 2026.

144522/FO/2025Approved

What was proposed

The scheme would enclose the ground-level walkway, create new entrances and internal floorspace, add a rooftop pavilion, terrace, lift access and PV panels.

“Proposal Creation of new rooftop pavilion, external terrace and lift access, and enclosure of ground level walkway to create new internal floorspace with associated elevational alterations and the introduction of PV panels to the roof.”

“A route through the building would be closed to create a new entrance to the offices. A rooftop terrace and lift access would also be created. Photovoltaic (PV) panels would improve the energy efficiency of the building.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The five-storey office building has ground-floor commercial units and an east-west walkway between Piccadilly Gardens and Portland Street.

“One Piccadilly is a 5-storey office building with double height ground floor commercial units. An east-west walkway through it is recessed from the Piccadilly Gardens and Portland Street frontages. Access to the upper office floors is from within this walkway.”

“Smithfield Conservation Area is beyond this. A number of Grade II listed buildings including nos. 47, 49, 59 and 61 Piccadilly, the Gardens Hotel, Clayton House and St Margarets Chambers, and the Wellington and Victoria statues nearby.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the works would improve the office, create jobs and amenity space, support regeneration and provide environmental benefits.

“Principle of the proposal and the scheme contribution to regeneration - The scheme would deliver economic, social and environmental benefits. The proposal would support the attractiveness of this office building, improve the amenity offer, and complement the regeneration of Piccadilly Gardens.”

“Economic- The proposal would ensure that the office remains competitive and meets current occupier demands with improved amenity provision and an enhanced entrance. Jobs would be created during construction and when the use is operational.”

Officer report

The walkway and local businesses

The walkway would close, but alternative routes would remain, while nearby commercial units would retain prominent entrances despite reduced visibility and footfall.

“Four ground floor commercial units abut the walkway. Two have secondary entrances in the walkway, one of which would be closed. The door to the Pret a Manger unit would remain open for employee use. The only pedestrian access to this area would be office workers. The glazing to the commercial units would be obscured with solid partitions.”

“As a result, the footfall would decrease and the partitions would remove visibility into the commercial spaces and partially reduce the extent of active ground floor frontage onto the walkway. The units would remain highly visible with active frontages onto Piccadilly Gardens and Portland Street. These elevations contain the principal entrances to these commercial units.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Two objections concerned the walkway and a nearby commercial unit, while consultees raised conditions but no objection to the proposal.

“Publicity – The proposal has been advertised in the local press as affecting the setting of the conservation area, nearby listed buildings and a right of way. A site notice has been displayed and notification letters sent to neighbours.”

“- The walkway is a strategic pedestrian link, and its openness, transparency, permeability and visibility encourages movement through the building. Closure affects continued success of the business. - The closure would reduce pedestrian flow and pedestrians would bypass existing tenants and lead to a decline in visitors and reduce peak-time trade. It would reduce visibility, weakening the unit’s relationship with Piccadilly Gardens.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members discussed footfall, the number of exits and how losing the right-of-way cut-through would affect people using Piccadilly Gardens.

“During discussion of the item, the Committee raised issues regarding footfall, the number of exits proposed and the significance of the loss of the cut-through as a right of way on the users of Piccadilly Gardens.”

“The Planning Officer confirmed that access into the building would be the same, with doors at the end of either end of the current walkway. It was noted that 40k people used Piccadilly Gardens daily, the vast majority on its northern side, with 2k+ using the walkway, but about 2k accessing the offices, so only a small number used as a…”

Minutes

The committee decision

The committee approved the application subject to the conditions set out for the development.

“The Chair invited the Committee to determine the application.”

“The Committee resolved to approve the application, subject to conditions set out within the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Manchester Planning Committee minutes, 28 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Manchester's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Manchester
Date
Thursday 28 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

52 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →