New wall opening at Nelson Street, Lancaster
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 16 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought listed building consent to create a new opening in an existing wall.
“25/01318/LB Listed building application for the creation of a new opening in an existing wall. Castle Ward A”
Minutes
The wall and heritage
The new access would be a minor insertion using relocated quoin materials, with simple railings and no undue heritage impact.
“The new access is a relatively minor insertion into the boundary wall, given the overall length of the existing wall, which forms both the southern and western boundary of the site. The scheme also seeks to make use of the quoin design feature for the new entrance, the materials for which will be relocated from the existing wall. The proposed railings are simple in their design and form.”
“Consequently, this minor change is considered to be undertaken sympathetically and will result in a neutral impact on the significance of the identified heritage asset. As such, there is no requirement to weigh up the public benefits of the scheme.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal would have a neutral heritage impact, improve pedestrian safety and protect existing trees through conditions.
“The proposed development is considered to have a neutral impact upon the identified heritage assets, including the conservation area. It also facilitates improved pedestrian safety and linkages within the area, without adverse impacts to existing trees on site.”
“That Listed Building Consent BE GRANTED subject to the following conditions:”
Officer report
The consultation response
The Conservation Officer raised no objection, subject to securing full details of the proposed railings by condition.
“The Conservation Officer raises no objections to the scheme, subject to full details of the proposed railings to be secured by a suitable condition.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillors Louise Belcher and Keith Budden proposed and seconded approval, which received 11 votes in favour, none against and no abstentions.
“It was proposed by Councillor Louise Belcher and seconded by Councillor Keith Budden:”
“Upon being put to the vote, 11 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved subject to conditions covering the time limit, approved plans and proposed railing details.
“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”
“Time limit. 2. Approved plans. 3. Details of the proposed Railings.”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 16 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 16 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 11 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.