Air source heat pumps at Ashton Memorial And Butterfly House Williamson Park, Lancaster

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 15 Dec 2025.

25/01140/FULApproved

The site

The site is in Williamson Park, a listed park and garden containing the Grade I listed Ashton Memorial and Grade II listed Butterfly House.

“Williamson Park is a Grade II listed park and garden (List Entry Number: 1000942) located to the east of Lancaster city centre on steeply sloping landscape, overlooking Lancaster and Morecambe Bay. It is a formal park established in the late 19th century, which originated from a sandstone quarry.”

“The Butterfly House (former Palm House), which is adjacent to the Memorial, is a Grade II listed building (List Entry Number: 1195061) built early 20th century as part of further improvement works in the park funded by Lord Ashton. Over the years, it has served as an educational facility, helping…”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Related listed building applications were pending, while pre-application advice had been given on decarbonisation works including air source heat pumps.

“A number of relevant applications relating to this site have previously been received by the Local Planning Authority. These include:”

“Application Number Proposal Decision 25/01441/LB Listed building application for the installation of Air Source Heat Pumps and associated enclosure, removal of redundant plant, construction of new enclosure to house packaged plant and new air handling unit, installation of a new heat pump gantry enclosure, installation of new radiators, emitters, replacement of the existing pipework distributions, upgrades to the Building Energy Management Systems.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the low-energy heating system’s public benefits outweighed the proposal’s low level of less than substantial heritage harm.

“The proposed development will result in a low level of less than substantial harm to the character and significance of Ashton Memorial & The Butterfly House, Williamson Park. However, it is considered subject to conditions as outlined below that this identified harm is outweighed by the public benefits that the scheme entails.”

“That Planning Permission BE GRANTED subject to the following conditions:”

Officer report

Main planning effects

The assessment considered heritage, noise, open space and trees, finding the impacts acceptable subject to conditions.

“The key considerations in the assessment of this application are:”

“Principle of development • Design and impact on designated heritage assets • Noise and Residential Amenity • Open Space • Trees…”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The conservation team, Historic England, County Archaeology and the Tree Protection Officer raised no objection, while the Gardens Trust objected to the gantry location.

“Conservation Team No objection - Conclude that there would be minor harm to the setting of the listed buildings and to the Registered Park and Garden cause by the new enclosure. This harm would be mitigated by the location within existing planting and behind a mature hedge. The new AHU enclosure is more impactful and would cause minor harm to the Grade II Butterfly House, but this is lessened as it is sensitively designed and replaces poor quality existing buildings.”

“The Gardens Trust Objection - We have concerns about the siting and buildability of the Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) gantry and enclosure in the proposed position near the summit and in the setting of the Ashton Memorial and Butterfly House.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors voted 15 in favour, with none against and no abstentions.

“It was proposed by Councillor Hamish Mills and seconded by Councillor Tom Fish:”

“Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved subject to conditions covering plans, materials, noise, trees, archaeology and removal of the units when use ceased.

“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”

“Time limit. 2. Approved plans. 3. Samples of Materials to be submitted. 4. Development in accordance with ASHP details set out within Noise Assessment. 5. Development in accordance with AIA. 6. Addendum AIA for proposed cabling to Sub-station. 7. Archaeological Watching Brief. 8. Scheme for 6no Replacement Trees. 9. Removal of Units upon cessation of use.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 15 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Lancaster
Date
Monday 15 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
15 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

34 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →