Listed building repairs at Lancaster City Museum, Lancaster
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 15 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
Repairs would replace a failed PVC outlet with lead lining, add lead flashing, repoint masonry and repair water-damaged internal plaster.
“25/01136/LB Listed building application for the repair and upgrade of existing rainwater goods to include removal of PVC outlet pipe and reinstatement of lead lining to masonry outlet, inclusion of additional lead flashing to gulley and repair of water damaged plaster to internals of building. Castle Ward A”
Minutes
Why approval was advised
The works were considered necessary, sympathetic and beneficial to the listed building, with no harm to its significance or the Conservation Area.
“As outlined in the opening paragraphs, the proposed works will provide repairs to the existing rainwater goods which are failing on the building. The works are to the rear of the building facing New Street. The works proposed include the removal of a PVC pipe, which has failed and is causing water ingress, and replacement with traditional lead lining. This is considered a more suitable arrangement and is regarded a material improvement.”
“The proposed works will assist in the restoration and repair of this Grade II listed building and will be carried out using sympathetic materials that match and complement its historic character. These works will enhance the significance of both the listed building and the Conservation Area. Accordingly, the proposal is considered to accord with the development plan as a whole and is recommended for approval.”
Officer report
Conservation advice
The Council’s Conservation Officer raised no objection, subject to details of the repointing mortar and internal plaster repair method.
“Both the internal and external works are considered necessary and will help preserve and enhance the special architectural interest of the listed building. The scheme has been assessed by the Council’s Conservation Officer who has raised no objection, subject to the imposition of a condition to secure final details of the mortar for repointing and the method of internal plaster repairs.”
Officer report
The committee vote
The proposal was put to the vote and received 15 votes in favour, with none against and no abstentions.
“It was proposed by Councillor Robert Redfern and seconded by Councillor John Hanson:”
“Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 15 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 15 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 15 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
34 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.