Major mixed leisure development at Central Promenade Regeneration Site, Morecambe
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 16 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed varied designs and layouts for a major leisure development with an outdoor arena, public realm, landscaping and associated infrastructure.
“25/01118/VCN Demolition of existing buildings and proposed construction of major mixed leisure development in association with Eden Project (including use classes E, F1 and F2), outdoor arena (including live music performances), public realm, landscaping works, cycle parking, detached shelter and energy pods, and associated infrastructure and engineering operations (pursuant to the variation of condition 2 on planning permission 21/01113/FUL to amend the design and layout of…”
Minutes
The site and its history
The previously developed site has hosted substantial leisure attractions, festivals, seasonal fairgrounds and amusements, and includes fragmented public realm with social value.
“Moon element of the proposal, which is now a longer, but lower profile (20.05m AOD) inspired by local mussel shells. This previously developed site has historically accommodated substantial leisure attractions, namely the Super Swimming Stadium (the largest outdoor pool in Europe when it opened in 1936) prior to the Bubbles and The Dome development. More recently, the site has regularly been used for festivals, and seasonal fairgrounds and amusements.”
“The amended proposal has been accompanied by an extensive Design and Access Statement, describing the evolution of the design approach to the built development and the landscaping (amongst other considerations), as well as a Townscape, Seascape and Visual Impact Assessment (TSVIA).”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the amended development complied with policy and its environmental, social and economic benefits outweighed identified harm.
“The effects of the proposal on cultural heritage have been assessed in full, and there are beneficial impacts arising from the development on the Conservation Area and the setting of all listed buildings, except the Midland Hotel.”
“For the reasons set out above, the proposed development would constitute sustainable development with far-reaching environmental, social and economic benefits. Whilst there is heritage and potential residential amenity harm to weigh in the balance, these impacts have been reduced through this amended proposal and are capable of being mitigated.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillors proposed approval, and seven voted in favour with none against and no abstentions.
“It was proposed by Councillor Robert Redfern and seconded by Councillor Louise Belcher:”
“Upon being put to the vote, 7 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
Conditions
Approved subject to 1 condition, set out in the minutes.
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 16 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 16 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 7 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.