Heat pumps and window glazing at The Storey, Meeting House Lane, Lancaster

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 15 Dec 2025.

25/01005/LBRefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought listed building consent for air source heat pumps, a plant enclosure, a canopy, internal works and secondary window glazing.

“25/01005/LB Listed building application for air source heat pumps with plant enclosure, canopy, internal works including replacement radiators and secondary window glazing. Castle Ward R”

Minutes

The heritage impact

The heat pumps and secondary glazing were assessed as causing a high level of less than substantial harm to the listed building and walls.

“Overall, it is considered that the proposed ASHPs and installation of secondary glazing to the curved bay corridor window (WF – 61 to WF – 66) would cause a high level of less than substantial harm to the listed building and associated structures (walls and steps). This harm has not been sufficiently justified and is not outweighed by the wider public benefits arising from the decarbonisation project.”

“Whilst the Local Planning Authority is supportive of proposals for renewable and low carbon energy generation in respect of listed buildings, this is subject to compliance with all relevant heritage policies. In this case the site relates to a Grade II listed building, walls and steps.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the design and siting were inappropriate, the heritage harm was not justified, and public benefits did not outweigh it.

“That Listed Building Consent BE REFUSED for the following reason:”

“By reason of the inappropriate scale, design, appearance and siting, the proposed Air Source Heat Pumps and associated enclosures would appear as an industrial and utilitarian form of development which would cause a high level of less than substantial harm to the significance and special interest of the Grade II Listed Building and Grade II Listed walls.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors proposed refusal, and the proposal passed with 9 votes in favour, none against and 6 abstentions.

“It was proposed by Councillor Sandra Thornberry and seconded by Councillor Robert Redfern:”

“Upon being put to the vote, 9 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and 6 abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”

Minutes

The decision

Listed building consent was refused because the works would harm the significance and special interest of the Grade II listed building and walls.

“That Listed Building consent be refused for the following reason:”

Minutes

Sources

  • Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 15 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Lancaster
Date
Monday 15 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Vote
9 for refusal, 0 against, 6 abstained
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

34 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →