11-unit industrial buildings at Land Adjacent Galgate Mill, Chapel Lane, Galgate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 24 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought amended plans for two employment buildings containing 11 units, with changes to windows, doors, lighting and parking.
“Planning permission has been granted through 23/01353/FUL for the erection of two industrial/employment buildings comprised of 11 units. This current application seeks to vary condition 2 with amended approved elevations and floor plans. The proposal seeks the removal of side elevation windows to Units 1 to 4, with rearranged openings to the rear south facing elevation, with two additional roller shutter and pedestrian doors proposed to the north facing frontage.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site lies north and north-east of Galgate Mill within a largely employment-focused area containing nearby listed buildings.
“The application site encompasses land to the north and north-east of Galgate Mill in Galgate. The site stretches from Chapel Lane in the west, over to the open field to the east. The site includes part of the car parking area/access route to the north of a two-storey brick building which runs perpendicular to Chapel Lane, to the north of the main Galgate Mill building.”
“Galgate Silk Mills are two mill complexes on either side of Chapel Lane. Both are Grade II Listed Buildings of national heritage importance. The 5-storey red brick building is located immediately southwest of the application site (on the east side of Chapel Lane), and dates back to 1852, but is now in use as student accommodation. It has a distinctive square tall chimney, which is a local landmark.”
Officer report
Earlier planning decisions
The original employment development was approved, a later variation was refused, and some conditions were subsequently agreed.
“A number of relevant applications relating to this site have previously been received by the Local Planning Authority. These include:”
“Application Number Proposal Decision 24/01359/VCN Erection of two industrial/employment buildings comprised of 11 units (Class B2/E(g)) with associated parking/turning area, landscaping and associated infrastructure (pursuant to variation of condition 2 of planning permission 23/01353/FUL to amend previously approved plans including changes to elevations, floor plans, site plan and levels) Refused 24/00237/DIS Discharge of conditions 3, 4, 5 on approved application…”
Officer report
Why officers recommended approval
Officers considered the changes materially equivalent to the approved scheme, with acceptable lighting and parking and landscaping details required before first use.
“The proposed scheme is considered to be materially equivalent, and not diminished, from the approved development. The lighting details submitted are considered to be acceptable, and the altered parking arrangements and modestly reduced landscaping area are similarly unharmful, subject to full details of soft landscaping to be submitted prior to first use. Other matters are neutral or unchanged from the approved scheme.”
“Condition no. Description Type 1 Approved amended/varied plans Control 2 Employment and Skills Plan Pre-occupation 3 Details of sound insulation Control 4 Contamination investigation Pre-occupation 5 Facing materials to be agreed Control 6 Details of external lighting Control 7 Operation and Maintenance Manual (SuDS) Pre-occupation 8 Verification report (SuDS) Pre-occupation 9 Car-parking to be provided before occupation and retained in perpetuity Control 10 Cycle parking to…”
Officer report
What consultees and residents said
Highways and flood authorities raised no objection, conservation concerns were addressed by amended materials, and two objections focused on parking and congestion.
“Consultee Response Ellel Parish Council No observation received County Highways No objection Environmental Health No observation received Conservation Section Objection to the original submission. Amended sample materials considered a closer match in terms of the range of colour tones found in the older of the mills, and is irregularly coursed and finished so wouldn’t compete visually with the brick of the larger mill, addressing the primary concern.”
“Conflict with neighbouring businesses car parking spaces. • Adverse impact upon on-street parking, including parking along pavements and private land. • Increased traffic and congestion.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee approved the application unanimously, subject to the 16 conditions covering plans, environment, parking, landscaping and related matters.
“That the application be approved subject to the conditions in the Committee Report.”
“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 24 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 24 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 13 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
27 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.