Mower shed demolition at Lancaster City Council White Lund Depot, Morecambe
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 1 Sept 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought prior approval to demolish a former mower storage shed.
“This application seeks a determination as to whether prior approval is required for the demolition of a former mower storage shed.”
“Subject to the prior approval process, the proposal is considered to be permitted development by virtue of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as…”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The shed is at White Lund Depot, an employment site containing council buildings, parking, nearby homes and commercial properties.
“White Lund Depot is situated to the east of White Lund Road, near to the junction of White Lund Road and Westgate. The site compromises of numerous buildings that include office buildings, storerooms and the White Lund Plant Centre for Lancaster City Council members of staff. The remainder of the site consists of parking for council vehicles and staff parking.”
“To the northwest of the site are six residential properties, with further residential properties to the west of White Lund Road. To the north, east and south of the application site are various commercial properties that include Home Bargains and Whitehouse Motors.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier applications at the depot included temporary offices and replacement council buildings, and each listed application was permitted.
“A number of relevant applications relating to this site have previously been received by the Local Planning Authority. These include:”
“Application Number Proposal Decision 24/00437/VCN Retrospective application for the temporary siting of 2 portable buildings to provide office space (pursuant to the variation of condition 1 on 23/01134/VCN to extend the time frame for removal) Permitted 23/01435/FUL Demolition of existing office building, canteen building, welfare building and greenhouse and erection of a new office building, canteen and welfare building Permitted 23/01134/VCN Retrospective application for…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended granting prior approval because the demolition method and restoration details were acceptable and impacts were unlikely to be adverse.
“As such, the Method of Demolition Statement has established the means of demolition with regards to the site and area and it is considered that if the proposal were carried out in accordance with these details, it would not result in any adverse impacts and would be considered acceptable.”
“Where prior approval is required, the local planning authority can seek details of the restoration of the site following demolition. Following the demolition of this building, the Method of Demolition Statement outlines that the concrete base will be retained and will be used for the storage/parking of vehicles and the storage of materials and goods.”
Officer report
Main issues considered
The assessment considered the permitted development requirements, demolition and restoration methods, and possible effects on protected species.
“Whether the proposal meets the requirements of Schedule 2 Part 11 Class B of the Order • Method of demolition and restoration of the site • Protected species…”
“Schedule 2 Part 11 Class B of the Order permits “any building operation consisting of the demolition of a building.” This is subject to some exclusions (sub-section B.1) and conditions (sub section B.2). The proposal is not affected by the exclusions set out in sub-section B.1 and in accordance with B.1(i), the developer (in this case Lancaster City Council) has applied to the local planning authority for a determination as to whether prior approval is required.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The town council and Environmental Health gave no response, while no public responses had been received when the report was prepared.
“No responses have been received by members of the public at the time of compiling this report.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillors voted unanimously for the proposal, with 15 in favour, none against and no abstentions.
“It was proposed by Councillor John Hanson and seconded by Councillor Sandra Thornberry:”
“Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
The decision
Prior approval for demolition was required and granted.
“That prior approval for demolition is required and granted.”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 1 September 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 1 September 2025
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 15 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.