Up to 200 dwellings at Land To The West Of Slyne Road, Bolton-le-Sands
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 16 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought outline permission for up to 200 homes, affordable housing, public open space, landscaping, drainage and associated works, with access decided now.
“Alongside the provision of up to 200 dwellings, the proposal shall include the provision of affordable housing, on-site public open space and associated infrastructure, such as the provision of a sustainable drainage scheme.”
“Illustrative plans including a Development Framework Plan, Masterplan, Green/Blue Infrastructure Strategy Plan and a Design and Access Statement have been submitted in support of the application.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site comprises four agricultural fields on the southern edge of Bolton-le-Sands, beside existing housing, Slyne Road and neighbouring settlements.
“The site forming the subject of this application is formed by four agricultural fields located on the southern edge of the village of Bolton-le-Sands, within the Bolton-le-Sands Parish area. The southern boundary of the site is also close to the northern periphery of the village of Slyne, separated from the nearest residential development situated along Main Road/Slyne Road (A6) and Manor Lane by further agricultural fields.”
“The application site area measures 11.31 hectares. The northern boundary of the site lies adjacent to existing residential development located along Greenwood Drive, Greenwood Avenue, Pinewood Avenue and Ashworth Drive. The eastern boundary of the site is formed by a field boundary hedgerow which runs parallel with Slyne Road (A6). Slyne Road (A6) is an ‘A’ class road subject to a 40mph speed limit past the majority of the site.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier applications involved a screening opinion for residential development and pre-application advice for up to 250 homes.
“The site has a very limited planning history. The only relevant case relates to the screening opinion for the proposed development earlier in 2025, which is detailed below:”
“Application Number Proposal Decision 25/00138/EIR Screening Opinion for proposed residential development Not EIA development…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to conditions and a legal agreement, concluding that the site was Grey Belt land and the homes were not inappropriate Green Belt development.
“Approval subject to conditions and completion of Section 106 Agreement. Delegate back to Chief Officer – Planning and Climate Change to finalise legal agreement.”
Officer report
Who spoke
Eleven people, a county councillor and the agent spoke against or in favour of the application under public participation.
What members debated
Members proposed refusal because they considered the surrounding settlements a large built-up area, the site strongly contributed to Green Belt purpose A, and it was not Grey Belt land.
“It was proposed by Councillor Keith Budden, and seconded by Councillor Martin Bottoms, contrary to the officer’s recommendation in the report:”
“The surrounding settlements, in particular Bolton-le-Sands, constitute large built-up area. • The development would result in the expansion of a large built-up area which currently strongly contributes to purpose A) of the Green Belt purposes.”
Minutes
The committee vote
The refusal proposal passed with 10 votes in favour, 3 against and 2 abstentions.
“Upon being put to the vote, 10 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with 3 against and 2 abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“On the following grounds: • The surrounding settlements, in particular Bolton-le-Sands, constitute large built-up area. • The development would result in the expansion of a large built-up area which currently strongly contributes to purpose A) of the Green Belt purposes. • The site is not Grey Belt land; therefore, the development would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt and would result in harm to its openness, contrary to the NPPF and local plan policies which seek to protect the Green Belt. THE CHAIR ADJOURNED”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 16 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 16 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Vote
- 10 for refusal, 3 against, 2 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.