Two-bedroom holiday let at The Brow, Annexe, Station Road, Coniston
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lake District Development Control Committee on 1 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a two-bedroom annexe into a single-unit, two-bedroom short-term holiday let, without external alterations.
“Planning permission was granted for the restoration of a former cottage to provide annexed accommodation on 12 September 1989 (application reference 7/1989/5541). Condition 5 states, “The accommodation hereby approved shall not be used other than for the occupation by members of the family or visiting friends or relatives of the occupier for the time being of the dwelling known as The Brow, Coniston, and the accommodation shall remain as a single planning unit with the…”
“Planning permission is sought for the change of use of the annexe to a 2-bedroom short-term holiday let. No external alterations are proposed.”
Officer report
The site and its history
The traditional stone and slate building is accessed by a private driveway and was approved in 1989 as annexe accommodation linked to the main house.
“The application site comprises a traditional stone and slate building known as The Brow Annexe, accessed from a private driveway off Station Road in Coniston.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the building was unsuitable for permanent housing and the holiday use could be tied to the main house.
“I consider that there are constraints to the site which make the building unsuitable for permanent occupation including: • There is a direct view out of windows on the northern elevation into the garden of The Brow. • The garden belonging to The Brow wraps around the annexe and its garden. • There is limited storage space within the building due to the small internal floor area, for essential goods such as a washing machine.”
“In view of the above, I consider that the building is not suitable for use as a permanent dwelling in terms of size, layout, proximity to neighbouring dwellings and outdoor amenity space due to the impact on the amenity of both the occupants of the building and the neighbouring dwelling, The Brow.”
Officer report
Main planning effects
Officers considered the proposal acceptable for landscape character, neighbours’ amenity, highway safety and access, subject to conditions.
“In view of the above, I am satisfied that the development proposed is acceptable in terms of its impact on the character and appearance of the area, satisfying the requirements of Local Plan Policies 01, 02, 05, 06, the Design Code SPD and the NPPF.”
“Because of the impact of the proposal on the amenity of the occupants of The Brow, the holiday letting use would be acceptable if operated wholly in association with the existing dwelling. I therefore recommend a condition tying the use of the building to The Brow.”
Officer report
The objection
The parish council objected because the building was said to be unsuitable as an independent dwelling and should support local housing needs.
“The reasoning behind the condition on the permission granted in 1989 (7/1989/5541) was the unsuitability of The Annexe as an independent dwelling and there is no evidence of any work has been completed to overcome said unsuitability.”
“They state that the demand for local homes remains a priority for members of Coniston Parish. They state that if the annexe is suitable as an independent dwelling, then it should contribute to the needs of the local community and must be secured for permanent occupation as someone’s main residence and not for holiday use or second-home use, subject to local occupancy controls and consistent with the Coniston Neighbourhood Plan prioritisation of local housing.”
Officer report
The conditions
The holiday let must remain part of the main house’s planning unit, operate only as short-term accommodation, and limit stays to 35 days per year.
“The short-term holiday let accommodation hereby permitted shall only be used as part of a single planning unit together with the main house, known as The Brow.”
“The accommodation hereby permitted shall only be occupied for the purposes of short-term holiday letting, and shall not be occupied by any one individual, family or group for a period exceeding 35 days in any calendar year.”
Officer report
The committee vote
A motion to approve with conditions was proposed and seconded; five members supported it and one abstained.
“Motion to approve the application with conditions Proposed by [name withheld] by [name withheld]…”
“Members in favour of motion: Abstentions: 1”
Minutes
Sources
- Lake District Development Control Committee minutes, 1 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lake District's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lake District
- Date
- Wednesday 1 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lake District committee decisions →
This committee's year
49 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.