Double-glazed timber windows at 2-4 Colville Road, Kensington, London W11
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee on 18 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed replacing single-glazed timber windows and glazed doors with double-glazed timber windows and doors.
“/PP/25/04520:2 4.The proposal and any relevant planning history 4.1Planning permission has been sought for: -Replacement of single glazed timber sash and casement windows and glazed doors with double-glazed timber sash and casement windows and doors 4.2Officers visited the site on 29/10/2025. 4.3There is no relevant planning history.”
Officer report
The site
The property is in the Colville Conservation Area and has a mix of sash and casement windows.
“Where appropriate and necessary, conditions are recommended to address the concerns raised. It is recommended the Committee grants planning permission with the conditions listed in Section 9 of this report. 2.Reason for committee consideration · The [the applicant] of Kensington and Chelsea (the Council) is the applicant. 3.The site and its surroundings 3.1 The application site lies within the Colville Conservation Area. The property features a mix of sash and casement windows.”
Officer report
The main planning issue
The replacement windows and doors would fit existing openings, with no discernible exterior change, and would preserve the area’s character and significance.
“/PP/25/04520:3 no new openings are proposed, and therefore the proposal would comply with the requirements as set out within policy CD9 of the Local Plan 2024. 6.3Biodiversity net gain (BNG) has become mandatory from 12 February 2024 under the Environment Act 2021. The development would be below the threshold for BNG, and therefore, would be exempt.”
“Issues and balancing 6.6The proposed replacement windows and doors, given their design, scale and materials would have acceptable impact on the neighbouring properties and would preserve the character, appearance and significance of the building and wider conservation area. Overall, the proposal would comply with the relevant policies in the development plan, as well as complying with the statutory requirements for development within a conservation area.”
Officer report
Objection received
One objector questioned the door and window positions and requested a change to a toilet door lock.
“/PP/25/04520:4 CommentResponse 1 The position of the door looks like it is in the wrong position. The window should also be on the right side. Request for toilet door lock to be changed. The application is for a simple like-for-like replacements which is acceptable. The request for a new door lock was passed on to the Housing Management Team.”
Officer report
Who spoke
No speakers were present when the application was considered.
The committee vote
The committee voted unanimously to grant planning permission with the listed conditions.
“Resolved unanimously: to grant planning permission with the conditions listed in section 9 of the officer report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee minutes, 18 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Kensington And Chelsea's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Kensington And Chelsea
- Date
- Tuesday 18 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Kensington And Chelsea committee decisions →
This committee's year
34 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.