Kensington and Chelsea planning committee

Councillor Tim Verboven

Earl's Court wardMember, Planning Applications Committee

Seen at planning committee from October 2025 to November 2025

  • 2 of 2meetings attended
  • 5recorded votes
  • 10agreed, no vote against recorded
  • 100%with the majority
  • 0%against officer advice

Councillor's page on the council's website

As at 6 October 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Kensington and Chelsea’s published minutes, Councillor Tim Verboven attended 2 of the 2 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from October 2025 to November 2025. Each member's vote is recorded on 5 decisions at those meetings: Verboven voted for the resolution on all 5. On 5 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and none went against it. On 10 other decisions the minutes record no vote against, so Verboven is counted as agreeing; they are left out of the shares below.

Meetings attended
2 of 2
Too few meetings for a percentage.Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
23
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Recorded votes
5
Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 5 for, 0 against, 0 abstained.
With the majority
5 of 5100%
Votes for the resolution the committee passed. An abstention is not counted as with the majority.
Agreed, no vote against recorded
10
Decisions the minutes record with no vote against and no count. Counted as agreeing, and left out of the shares.
Votes against officer advice
0 of 50%
Recorded votes where the officers’ recommendation is known: for a resolution that went against it, or against one that followed it.
Proposed or seconded
0 / 1
Motions the minutes say they proposed, then seconded, that the committee passed.
Declared interests
0
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

Votes by quarter

Not drawn: 5 recorded votes in one quarter is too few to show a pattern over time.

Against officer advice

Verboven went against officer advice less often than the committee: 0% of votes, against 10% of decisions.

The share that went against the officers’ recommendation.

Verboven’s votes0%0 of 5
The committee’s decisions at their meetings10%2 of 20

The typical member of this committee (the median of 13 members with 5 or more such votes) voted against officer advice on 0% of them.

Agreement with other members

Not drawn: the minutes record no divided vote of this councillor by name. On a unanimous vote every member agrees, so it says nothing about agreement.

Attendance

2 of 2

2 of 2 meetings whose minutes list them.

The typical member of this committee attended 100% (the median of 7 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

Present
2025

Planning Applications Committee: 2 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
4 Nov 2025Planning Applications CommitteePresent
21 Oct 2025Planning Applications CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Verboven moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

The minutes we hold do not quote this councillor by name.

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from Kensington and Chelsea’s published planning committee minutes, 17 meetings from September 2025 to October 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All Kensington and Chelsea committee councillors