Six two-bedroom houses at Land Adjacent 20 And 27 Westwood Close, Cowes
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Isle Of Wight Planning Committee on 13 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed six two-storey houses, with gardens, footpath access and six additional parking spaces.
“Full planning consent is sought to construct six two storey houses. The plans show that the houses would be arranged as one pair of semi-detached houses, located adjacent to and east of 27 Westwood Close, and a terrace of four houses arranged with a staggered footprint, east of 20 Westwood Close.”
“Each house would include an open plan kitchen, lounge and dining room at ground floor level, with two bedrooms and a bathroom at first floor level. Each property would include front and rear gardens and be accessed via a footpath leading from Westwood Close. Six new parking spaces would be provided at the western end of the Close, adjacent to 35 Parklands Avenue, with one space allocated to each house.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site was vacant scrubland at the eastern end of Westwood Close, beside houses, a football ground and rear gardens.
“The majority of the houses do not include parking areas, instead there is a courtyard of garages between the houses within the close, and those that front onto nearby Parklands Avenue. The application site is located at the eastern end of the Close and forms an irregularly shaped area of scrubby vacant land, enclosed by a mix of fencing, trees and undergrowth.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier proposals included permission for 28 dwellings in 1972 and a refused appeal for four houses and a play area in 1994.
“TCP/2645/L – Erection of 28 dwellings – Granted planning permission 21 st April 1972.”
“TCP/16774/U – Terrace of 4 houses and play area – Refused planning permission 14 th December 1993. Subsequent appeal dismissed 24 th April 1994.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Ecology officers requested further surveys and a revised biodiversity metric, while Island Roads accepted parking and highway capacity but identified inadequate visibility.
“The Planning Ecology Officer has advised that a revised biodiversity metric would be required, that proposed BNG could incorporate onsite provision and advised that a preliminary ecological appraisal should be provided.”
“Island Roads have advised that the development would not result in a severe impact on the capacity of the highway network, would comprise a compliant level of parking but concluded that the proposed parking bays would not include adequate levels of visibility.”
Officer report
Residents’ concerns
Eight objections raised concerns about wildlife, overlooking, loss of light, parking, access, emergency services, construction disruption and drainage.
“Loss of light to gardens and houses. • Overlooking of houses and gardens. • There are many foxes and badgers that use the piece of land. • The land should be fully surveyed for any badgers and bats as per the biodiversity code of practice. • Impact of noise from building machinery. • Impact of the development on trees and scrub. • Impact on adjacent oak tree. • The removal of existing scrub and trees may impact on habitat and air quality.”
“The current plan does not take into account that the proposed parking will reduce on-street parking availability for the existing residents and therefore likely to exacerbate parking availability. • The parking would be close to the road junction. • Existing parking spaces would be displaced. • Disruption to the close. • It would be extremely disruptive and damaging to surrounding area as it is a built up area.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
Members questioned visibility onto Parklands Avenue, and officers said they had balanced traffic speed and accident records against the development’s benefits.
“The Chair informed the Committee that in accordance with the Council’s Constitution (Part 5 – Councillors’ Code of Good Planning Practice Paragraph 5.213) only those councillors who were present at the meeting held on Tuesday, 7 October 2025 could vote on the application.”
“Questions were raised regarding the visibility onto Parklands Avenue following issues raised previously, officers advised that Island Roads comments had not changed, however officers had balanced the speed of traffic and the number of reported accidents in the area against the benefit of the development when reaching the recommendation put forward.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee considered and agreed with the recommendation’s stated reasons, then resolved to approve the application.
“Decision: The Committee had taken into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out under the paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and resolved:”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The minutes do not record the members' reasons for departing from the officers' recommendation.
Sources
- Isle Of Wight Planning Committee minutes, 13 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Isle Of Wight's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Isle Of Wight Planning Committee
- Council
- Isle Of Wight
- Date
- Tuesday 13 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Isle Of Wight committee decisions →
This committee's year
6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.