25MW solar farm at Land South Of Dougliehill Road And East Of B788, Port Glasgow
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Inverclyde Planning Board on 2 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
A 25MW solar farm was proposed with panels, substations, transformers, access tracks, fencing, CCTV, landscaping and temporary construction facilities.
“The solar array consists of 602 solar panel frames mounted approximately 3m above ground at approximate spacing distances of 3.6m (between panels). A typical angle of repose would be 25 degrees. The orientation is generally south facing for maximum performance. The panel construction includes glass, silicon and a backing material together with electrical components. A further layer of non-reflective material is included to reduce the effects of reflection.”
“Access to the site would be from Dougliehill Road with additional access via the existing Inverclyde wind farm track which runs southwest to northeast from the Devol substation to Port Glasgow. The junction with Dougliehill Road proposed a 4-5m carriageway and an 11m radius. Secondary access would be available for emergency services.”
Officer report
The site and its setting
The 70.19-hectare site is grazing and moorland in the Green Belt, near Port Glasgow, with watercourses and nearby energy infrastructure.
“The 70.19 Ha application site consists of grazing and moor land approximately 0.5km to the south of Port Glasgow, 1.5km southeast of Greenock with Kilmacolm 4km to the southeast. Access is achieved via two routes: the existing Dougliehill Road and the Inverclyde Wind Farm access (east). The surrounding moorland contains occasional residential properties, agricultural holdings and rural businesses.”
“The site can be described as urban fringe or semi-rural and is designated as Green Belt in the Local Development Plan. The site is adjacent to the Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park and is within Devol Local Nature Conservation Site (LNCS).”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the development would harm the Green Belt, landscape setting, visual character and cumulative effects near the urban edge.
“However, support for renewable energy development is not unconditional and proposals must also accord with other relevant policies of the Development Plan. In this instance, the application site occupies a particularly sensitive location within the Green Belt at the interface between Port Glasgow and the wider countryside. The site forms an important part of the landscape setting of the settlement and contributes to the open and scenic character of the Green Belt.”
“The proposed solar array, due to its large scale, extensive coverage and industrial appearance, fails to accord with Policy 8 (a) (ii) of National Planning Framework 4 as the purposes of the Green Belt are undermined; the proposal is not compatible with landscape character; the proposal is not designed to minimise visual impact on the Green Belt and the development would result in long term negative impacts on the environmental quality of the Green Belt.”
Officer report
What people said
One representation supported the proposal because it could strengthen the local economy and create employment, supply-chain opportunities and wider benefits.
“The application was advertised in the Greenock Telegraph on 10th July 2026 as there are no premises on neighbouring land.”
“PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The application was the subject of neighbour notification; one representation was received (support) which is summarised below: The Inverclyde Chamber of Commerce supports the proposal as it states that the development strengthens the local economy, creates employment opportunities and encourage sustainable economic growth.”
Officer report
Members considered the proposal
After discussion, one member moved approval subject to suggested conditions, while another moved refusal for the reasons in the report.
“The Chair adjourned the meeting at 3:14pm in order for suggested conditions related to matters referenced in the report, which were distributed at the meeting, to be read by Elected Members. The meeting reconvened at 3:24pm.”
“After discussion Councillor McCabe moved that planning permission be granted subject to the suggested conditions distributed at the meeting.”
Minutes
How members voted
Four members supported approval and two supported refusal, so the approval motion was carried.
“PLANNING BOARD – 2 SEPTEMBER 2026 _______________________________________________________________________”
“Following a roll call vote, 2 Members, Councillors Brooks and McVey voted in favour of the amendment and 4 Members, Provost McKenzie, Councillors Crowther, Curley and McCabe voted in favour of the motion which was declared carried.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The minutes do not record the members' reasons for departing from the officers' recommendation.
Approved subject to 1 condition, set out in the minutes.
Sources
- Inverclyde Planning Board minutes, 2 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Inverclyde's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Inverclyde Planning Board
- Council
- Inverclyde
- Date
- Wednesday 2 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Inverclyde committee decisions →
This committee's year
15 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.