Four traveller pitches at The Slips, West End Lane, Henfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Horsham Planning Committee on 2 Jun 2026.

DC/25/1700Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed four static caravans, four dayrooms, gardens, parking, access, planting and an enhanced grassland area.

“The application seeks planning permission for the stationing of four static caravans, each with a private garden area, parking, and permeable hardstanding, together with four associated day rooms. The proposal also includes access from West End Lane, the provision of native hedgerow planting, replacement and enhancement of boundary vegetation, and the creation of an enhanced grassland area.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a grassed parcel beside West End Lane with mature hedgerows, protected oak trees, open countryside and a drainage ditch.

“The application site, known as The Slips, is located on the southern side of West End Lane, Henfield, and comprises a broadly rectangular parcel of land accessed from the north via an existing gated entrance. The site is predominantly grassed and contains several mature…”

Officer report

Earlier application

An earlier proposal for five pitches and five dayrooms was withdrawn in August 2025.

“DC/25/0519 Change of use of land to the stationing of caravans for 5 gypsy and traveller pitches with 5 associated dayrooms, hard and soft landscaping, and parking (revised description) Withdrawn Application on 05.08.2025”

Officer report

Why officers recommended approval

Officers considered that substantial unmet traveller need outweighed moderate landscape change and that other impacts could be controlled by conditions.

“It is considered that although the application site is located within the countryside it is within a reasonable distance of services and facilities. Further, the scale of the site and its relationship with surrounding properties and land is such that there would be no adverse impacts on neighbouring amenity, highways safety concerns and landscape character subject to appropriately worded conditions.”

“When assessed against the policies of the NPPF taken as a whole, the adverse impacts identified, principally moderate landscape character change, do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits of delivering much-needed Gypsy and Traveller accommodation in the District.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways and ecology consultees raised no objection subject to measures, while drainage and landscaping details were addressed through further information and conditions.

“Further information is required before the drainage strategy can be supported. In particular, the applicant must provide full details of existing and proposed greenfield runoff rates (including Qbar), together with calculations for pre- and post-development runoff and discharge rates for the 100%, 3.33%, 1% and 1% +45% AEP storm events.”

“Additional information is required regarding permeable/impermeable area breakdowns, catchment plans, exceedance routing for extreme storm events, and measures to prevent pollution of receiving waters. Supporting foul drainage flow calculations are also needed, with confirmation that any treatment system complies with relevant legislation. A maintenance and management plan for all surface water and foul drainage features must be provided.”

Officer report

Objections received

Objectors and the parish council raised concerns about design, access, amenity, trees, drainage, infrastructure, sustainability, landscape and cumulative impact.

“Increased pressure on local infrastructure • Drainage and surface water concerns • Cumulative impact and lack of proven local need…”

“The Parish Council considers the development to be contrary to multiple policies of the Horsham District Planning Framework (HDPF), including Policies 1–4 relating to strategic site selection, site allocation and development outside built-up area boundaries; Policies 19 and 21 relating to the provision of caravan and gypsy and traveller accommodation; and Policies 23, 25, 31, 33, 34, 39 and 40 concerning landscape impact, natural environment, design, infrastructure…”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members discussed cumulative countryside and environmental harm, pedestrian access, active travel, sustainability and reliance on private cars.

“The Committee discussed the cumulative impact of the proposal and its potential harm to the countryside, landscape and environment.”

“Clarification was sought in relation to the sustainability of the site which included safe pedestrian access and opportunities for active travel to the village. Members also raised concerns regarding the potential for increased reliance on private car travel.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application in accordance with the officer recommendation, while requesting an additional informative about environmental permits and watercourse consent.

“That DC/25/1700 be approved in accordance with the Officer recommendation, subject to an additional informative seeking that Ward Members be kept updated regarding the status of matters referred to within the informatives relating to Environmental Permits and Ordinary Watercourse Consent.”

“However, these matters are controlled under separate legislation and regulatory regimes. Environmental Permits are issued by the Environment Agency, whilst Ordinary Water Course consent is issued by West Sussex County Council in its capacity as Lead Local Flood…”

Minutes

The members' reasons

“Members acknowledged that following further technical information provided by the Council’s Drainage Engineer, no amendments had been made to the proposed development, site layout or drainage strategy previously submitted.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Horsham Planning Committee minutes, 2 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Horsham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Horsham
Date
Tuesday 2 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →