Business park redevelopment at Stonehouse Farm, Plummers Plain
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Horsham Planning Committee on 6 Jan 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
The application proposed expanded commercial facilities, changes to existing buildings, a footpath diversion and three homes at Jacksons Farm.
“The Head of Development and Building Control reported that the application sought permission for; enhancement of existing commercial facilities at Stonehouse Business Park including the demolition of two buildings and their replacement with new facilities, the extension of the existing building to form a new office, the removal of the existing mobile home; the decommissioning of the Anaerobic Digester and re-use of the existing two buildings and the…”
Minutes
Planning history
Members noted the planning history of the application.
“Members noted the planning history of the application.”
Minutes
Support for the application
Three public speakers, Lower Beeding Parish Council and the ward member spoke in support.
“[As Ward Member for Nuthurst and Lower Beeding Councillor Dennis Livingstone spoke in support of application and then left the room and did not take part in the debate or vote on this application]”
Minutes
What members discussed
Members discussed biodiversity calculations, noise, urbanisation, vehicle movements, activity levels and effects on neighbourhood amenity.
“Members requested clarification regarding the biodiversity net gain calculations. Concerns were raised in relation to noise impacts and the potential for negative urbanisation effects however, having regard to the existing commercial operations in the vicinity, it was considered that the proposal would not result in further urbanisation of the local environment.”
“Members discussed vehicle movements, intensity of activities at the site and potential impacts on neighbourhood amenity.”
Minutes
The committee vote
A motion was proposed and seconded to approve the proposal, subject to agreed conditions and completion of a legal agreement.
“A motion was proposed and seconded to agree to the proposal subject to the delegation of planning permission to the Head of Development and Building Control subject to the agreement of conditions with the Local Member, Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning Committee and the completion of a s106 legal agreement.”
“To delegate approval of planning permission to the Head of Development and Building Control subject to the agreement of conditions with the Local Member, Chair and Vice-Chair and the completion of a s106 legal agreement.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved contrary to the officer recommendation because economic and biodiversity benefits outweighed countryside and nearby residents’ amenity impacts.
“That DC/25/0403 be approved contrary to Officer recommendation with the following resolution:”
“For the following reason: The economic and biodiversity benefits of the development are considered to outweigh the impact on the amenity of the countryside and nearby residents, in accordance with development plan policy.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
Minutes
- The economic and biodiversity benefits of the development are considered to outweigh the impact on the amenity of the countryside and nearby residents, in accordance with development plan policy. [Councillor Claire Vickers left the meeting at 8.00 p.m.] Planning Committee 6 January 2026 4 PC/18
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Councillors at the meeting
- Len Ellis-BrownChairGreen
- Peter van der BorghChairLib Dem
- Colette BlackburnLib Dem
- Paul ClarkeConservative
- Mike CrokerGreen
- Anthony FranklandLib Dem
- Joan GrechGreen
- Lynn LambertConservative
- Dennis LivingstoneDeclared an interest and left for this itemLib Dem
- Jay MercerLib Dem
- Roger NoelConservative
- Sam RabyLib Dem
- John TrollopeLib Dem
- Clive TrottLib Dem
- Claire VickersConservative
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Horsham Planning Committee minutes, 6 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Horsham's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Horsham Planning Committee
- Council
- Horsham
- Date
- Tuesday 6 January 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Councillors
- 14Lib Dem 7Conservative 4Green 3Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Horsham committee decisions →
This committee's year
34 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.