673-home mixed-use redevelopment at Millington Road, Hayes

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Hillingdon Planning Committee on 11 Mar 2026.

79625/APP/2025/2128Approved

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the sustainably located housing, employment, family homes and town-centre benefits to outweigh minor conflicts, with conditions and obligations addressing remaining impacts.

“The proposed loss of the existing underutilised office use is accepted in principle. There are no objections to the loss of the existing office buildings themselves as they are not considered to have significant architectural merit. Significantly, the provision of much needed residential units on sustainably located brownfield land within close proximity to Hayes Town Centre and only 500m (8 minute walk) of the Hayes and Harlington Station is supported.”

“Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states that planning applications should be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. For the reasons outlined above and within the main body of the report, the application is considered to broadly comply with the Development Plan.”

Officer report

Community views

One resident supported local improvements and public space; neutral comments sought recognition of aviation heritage and a suitable local business for the commercial space.

“The proposed commercial unit should be occupied by a local hospitality business which should be supported to ensure that the space does not remain empty.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members discussed office-to-housing change, transport contributions, heritage-led public art, parking displacement, water measures, pollution prevention and health infrastructure funding.

“Members discussed the proposed development in the context of changing office use patterns and increasing residential intensity in the area. Clarification was sought on the Section 106 transport contributions, particularly the extent of Transport for London’s discretion over how funds would be spent.”

“Heritage matters were considered, with Members noting the site’s aviation and industrial history and seeking assurance that heritage-led public art would be delivered. Officers advised that the design code referenced the site’s history and that public art was secured through existing conditions. Parking impacts were also discussed, particularly in relation to visitor parking and displacement onto nearby residential streets.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The officers’ recommendation was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed.

“The officers’ recommendation was moved, seconded and, when put to the vote, was unanimously agreed.”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved in line with the officers’ recommendation, subject to the proposed legal agreement, conditions and referral requirements.

“RESOLVED: That the application be approved as per officer recommendation.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Hillingdon Planning Committee minutes, 11 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Hillingdon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Hillingdon
Date
Wednesday 11 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

39 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →