Two flats with extensions at 14 Coteford Close, Eastcote

What was proposed

The application proposed rear and side extensions, two flats, parking, landscaping and private amenity space.

“Proposal: Erection of a part single, part two storey rear extension together with a single storey side extension. Conversion of extended house into 1 x 1 -bedroom flat and 1 x 3-bedroom flat with associated parking, landscaping and private amenity space.”

“Planning permission is sought for the erection of a part single, part two storey rear and single storey side extension. In addition, the application seeks permission for the conversion of the extended house into 1 x 1 -bedroom flat and 1 x 3-bedroom flat with associated parking and landscaping.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the housing mix, design, living conditions, private gardens, parking and highway effects acceptable and recommended approval with conditions.

“The principle of the conversion is considered to comply with both local, London Plan and National Planning Policies. An assessment of properties along Coteford Close confirms that less than 10 percent of the properties have been converted to flats (compliant with policy). Furthermore, the property would continue to provide a family sized 3-bedroom home with access to private rear garden space.”

“With regards to design, the scale, bulk and massing is considered to respect the residential character of the area . The external extensions mirror a recent approval which was granted in February 2024. In addition, the impact on residential amenity was fully assessed and would not give rise to any undue impacts.”

Officer report

Who spoke

The lead petitioner was absent, while the applicant’s agent addressed members and said the flats were intended to remain flats.

Members’ discussion

Members asked about garden access and whether drainage advice could be made enforceable; officers explained why an informative was appropriate.

“In response to Members’ questions, it was confirmed that the rear garden was for the use of both flats. Occupants of the first floor flat could access the garden via the side access.”

“Members enquired whether the proposed informative in relation to the development being sited in a critical drainage area could be replaced by an enforceable condition. In response, officers affirmed that an informative was deemed to be appropriate given the substantial rear garden, the scale of the development and the low risk of flooding.”

Minutes

The vote and decision

Members unanimously agreed the officer recommendation and approved the application subject to conditions.

“Members raised no further objections or concerns. The officer’s recommendation was moved, seconded and, when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.”

“RESOLVED: That the application be approved subject to conditions as set out in the report.”

Minutes