Retail mezzanine and cafe at Unit 2 Ruislip Retail Park, Victoria Road, Ruislip
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Hillingdon Planning Committee on 5 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The applicant proposed a mezzanine floor for retail clothing, footwear, furniture and homewares, with an ancillary cafe and storage.
“Proposal: Installation of an internal mezzanine floor that can be used for Use Class E(a) retail purposes and use of floorspace for an ancillary cafe and back-of- house storage space.”
Officer report
The site
The site was a vacant retail unit within a four-unit retail park, with shared access, parking and cycle spaces.
“Vehicular access to the Site is via Victoria Road, with egress onto Field End Road. Car parking is to the north of the Site, with 304 spaces within the wider retail park. There are 36 cycle parking spaces adjacent the eastern boundary of the Site for retail park visitors. Site access, cycle parking, and car parking are shared between the retail park units. A separate shared service access is from Stonefield Way to the west.”
Officer report
Earlier permissions
The permission would supersede an earlier restriction on goods sold from Unit 2 and was linked to a separate refurbishment application.
“The Applicant has submitted this application alongside planning application reference 43510/APP/2024/3337, which seeks permission for ‘Refurbishment of the existing retail unit (Unit 2) for its use within Use Class E(a) to include the sale of clothing, footwear, furniture and homewares, and ancillary items, back-of-house storage space, a new shopfront and new fire exit door.’ This associated application is to be determined under delegated authority concurrent with this…”
Officer report
Consultation responses
No public representations were received, and consultees generally raised no objections subject to conditions or financial contributions.
“The LPA has not received any comments or representations in response to the public consultation. Consultee responses received are summarised in Table 2 (below). Full copies of the responses have also separately been made available to Members.”
Officer report
Members’ discussion
Members welcomed the proposal’s business and job benefits and were told the air quality contribution reflected detailed site-specific calculations.
“The Committee welcomed the proposal, noting that the new unit would benefit the local area by creating business opportunities and jobs. In response to a question on the reduced contribution and sustainable measures, it was explained that the amount had been calculated using a detailed methodology considering benchmarks and site- specific constraints.”
Minutes
The vote
The officer recommendation was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed by the committee.
“The officers’ recommendation, was moved, seconded, and when put to a vote, was unanimously agreed.”
Minutes
The decision
The application and Section 106 legal agreement were approved in accordance with the officer recommendation.
“RESOLVED: That the s106 legal agreement and application be approved as per officer recommendation.”
Minutes
Sources
- Hillingdon Planning Committee minutes, 5 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Hillingdon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Hillingdon Planning Committee
- Council
- Hillingdon
- Date
- Wednesday 5 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Hillingdon committee decisions →
This committee's year
25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.