21 affordable family homes at Haydon Drive Eastcote Haydon Drive Eastcote Pinner

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Hillingdon Planning Committee on 4 Sept 2025.

17979/APP/2025/1314Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed demolishing 16 studio bungalows and building 21 affordable family-sized houses with associated facilities.

“Site Address: Haydon Drive, Pinner, HA5 2PL Proposal: Demolition of 16 studio bungalows and the erection of 21 affordable family -sized houses with associated facilities. Summary of Recommendation…”

“GRANT planning permission subject to section 106 legal agreement and conditions…”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The 0.58-hectare site contains 16 bungalows, green open space, mature trees and public lawns in a low-density suburban setting.

“The application site area measures 0.58ha and contains 16 studio bungalows and large amounts of green open space, including a wide range of mature trees and public lawns. The surroundings are a low-density suburban setting characterised…”

“Hillingdon Planning Committee – 4th September 2025 PART 1 – Members, Public & Press  by 2-storey family housing with pitched roofs, including along Joel Street. Front gardens along Joel Street generally provide greening, car parking and access to private front doors. The public transport accessibility level (PTAL) of the area is 1b which is at the lower range of the scale.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the scheme acceptable because it would provide 100% social-rented housing, improve the site and provide suitable homes, open space and parking.

“The proposal is considered to be acceptable in principle, making effective use of an existing brownfield site to provide additional housing, and notably provide 100% affordable housing, secured as Social Rent. The proposal also secures the provision of 3no. accessible housing units and communal play space and open space that provides an inclusive, accessible and flexible development.”

“Due to the siting of the proposed development coupled with separation distances to adjoining buildings, the impact on residential amenity of nearby properties would be acceptable. The quality of accommodation proposed is considered to be of a high standard with sufficient outlook and access to natural light within the future units and amenity spaces, with all units meeting the minimum space standard requirements. A sufficient level of parking provision is also provided.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Consultees raised no objection subject to conditions on access, air quality, contamination and highways, while public open space and biodiversity improvements were sought.

“Request to retain Public Open Space, including public access, plus improved Biodiversity Net Gain.”

“No objection subject to conditions and an air quality contribution.”

Officer report

Objections received

Sixteen objections raised concerns including overdevelopment, residential amenity, noise, anti-social behaviour, construction disturbance, parking, traffic, wildlife and tenant displacement.

“Impact on amenity, noise and anti-social behaviour Discussed at paragraphs 7.22 - 7.23 and 7.57 - 7.58 of this report.”

“Noise and disturbance from building work Discussed at paragraph 7.22 of this report.”

Officer report

Members’ questions

Members discussed possible HMO conversion, separation distances, blank elevations, solar panels, carbon savings, parking, trees and landscaping.

“Members asked about the use of solar panels. Officers noted that the energy strategy included solar panels and heat pumps; a planning condition required implementation prior to occupation; and the scheme exceeded the London Plan’s minimum carbon offset requirement of 35%, making it policy compliant. The development will deliver significant on-site carbon savings. Officers cannot insist on higher-grade solar panels beyond policy compliance.”

“Members asked for further information on parking and tree planting. Officers confirmed that 25 car parking spaces would be provided, including three accessible spaces, two motorcycle spaces and cycle storage. Tree planting and landscaping were included in the scheme. On parking allocation, officers confirmed this would be addressed under Condition 11, which covered parking management and allocation.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The officers’ recommendation was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed.

“Officers’ recommendations were moved, seconded and when put to a vote, unanimously agreed.”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved, with the proposal secured as affordable housing through a legal agreement and subject to conditions.

“Members raised a query regarding the potential future use of the properties as HMOs, seeking reassurance that any such change would require planning approval. Officers advised that the development was proposed as 100% affordable housing, which would be secured via a legal agreement. This would mitigate concerns about future conversion to HMOs.”

“RESOLVED: That the application be approved…”

Minutes

Sources

  • Hillingdon Planning Committee minutes, 4 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Hillingdon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Hillingdon
Date
Thursday 4 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

18 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →