Single-storey rear extension at 111 High Hill Road, New Mills

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by High Peak Development Control Committee on 19 Jan 2026.

HPK/2025/0325Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a single-storey rear extension, concrete access ramp and rear patio, providing a kitchen, dining area, accessible bedroom and wet room.

“The application seeks full planning permission for the erection of a single-storey rear extension with a concrete ramp to support access to the extension and rear patio.”

“The proposed rear extension would measure a maximum height of 3.5m, a width of 7.1 m and a depth of 4.6m. The extension will accommodate a kitchen/dining area, an accessible bedroom, and within the existing property a new wet room would be created. Proposed materials are to match the existing dwelling.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a two-storey semi-detached home in an established residential area, with front parking, a rear garden and no heritage constraints.

“The application site relates to a two-storey semi-detached dwelling constructed in stone, with a small soft-landscaped front garden and a concrete footpath leading to the main entrance. The footpath also provides side access to the rear garden. Parking for two vehicles is available at the front of the property.”

“The surrounding character is predominantly residential, comprising similar semi- detached and terraced properties. The site benefits from a modest front garden and private rear garden, with vehicular access taken directly from High Hill Road. There are no heritage constraints on this site.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the design and residential amenity impacts were acceptable, with conditions including matching materials and surface-water drainage.

“LP Policy EQ6 requires all new development to have a satisfactory relationship with existing land and buildings to protect the amenity of the area, which includes the residential amenity of neighbouring properties. Aspects of residential amenity include impacts such as a loss of sunlight, overshadowing and overbearing impacts, loss of outlook, and loss of privacy.”

“The proposal is considered acceptable in terms of design and residential amenity. There would be no harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and is considered to be in accordance with the relevant policies put forward in the Local Plan and NPPF. Therefore, the application is recommended for approval.”

Officer report

Consultation and representations

One neighbour supported the extension in principle but sought clarification about drainage, the shared shed and protection of the adjoining property.

“In principle, I have no objections to the extension as I understand the family needs it. However, as an adjoining property owner, I have some questions that require clarification and documentation to ensure there is no damage to my property in the future. There is no mention on the plans regarding drainage provisions.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application as set out in the report and delegated limited changes to the decision wording before issue.

“That the application be approved as set out in the report; and…”

“That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.”

Minutes

Sources

  • High Peak Development Control Committee minutes, 19 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of High Peak's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
High Peak
Date
Monday 19 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →