Single-storey rear extension at 111 High Hill Road, New Mills
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by High Peak Development Control Committee on 19 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a single-storey rear extension, concrete access ramp and rear patio, providing a kitchen, dining area, accessible bedroom and wet room.
“The application seeks full planning permission for the erection of a single-storey rear extension with a concrete ramp to support access to the extension and rear patio.”
“The proposed rear extension would measure a maximum height of 3.5m, a width of 7.1 m and a depth of 4.6m. The extension will accommodate a kitchen/dining area, an accessible bedroom, and within the existing property a new wet room would be created. Proposed materials are to match the existing dwelling.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a two-storey semi-detached home in an established residential area, with front parking, a rear garden and no heritage constraints.
“The application site relates to a two-storey semi-detached dwelling constructed in stone, with a small soft-landscaped front garden and a concrete footpath leading to the main entrance. The footpath also provides side access to the rear garden. Parking for two vehicles is available at the front of the property.”
“The surrounding character is predominantly residential, comprising similar semi- detached and terraced properties. The site benefits from a modest front garden and private rear garden, with vehicular access taken directly from High Hill Road. There are no heritage constraints on this site.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended approval because the design and residential amenity impacts were acceptable, with conditions including matching materials and surface-water drainage.
“LP Policy EQ6 requires all new development to have a satisfactory relationship with existing land and buildings to protect the amenity of the area, which includes the residential amenity of neighbouring properties. Aspects of residential amenity include impacts such as a loss of sunlight, overshadowing and overbearing impacts, loss of outlook, and loss of privacy.”
“The proposal is considered acceptable in terms of design and residential amenity. There would be no harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and is considered to be in accordance with the relevant policies put forward in the Local Plan and NPPF. Therefore, the application is recommended for approval.”
Officer report
Consultation and representations
One neighbour supported the extension in principle but sought clarification about drainage, the shared shed and protection of the adjoining property.
“In principle, I have no objections to the extension as I understand the family needs it. However, as an adjoining property owner, I have some questions that require clarification and documentation to ensure there is no damage to my property in the future. There is no mention on the plans regarding drainage provisions.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee approved the application as set out in the report and delegated limited changes to the decision wording before issue.
“That the application be approved as set out in the report; and…”
“That in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Development Services be delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chair of the Committee, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.”
Minutes
Sources
- High Peak Development Control Committee minutes, 19 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of High Peak's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- High Peak
- Date
- Monday 19 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- High Peak committee decisions →
This committee's year
31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.