Battery storage facility at Bowenhurst Farm, Mill Lane, Farnham
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Hart Development Management Committee on 18 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
A 40-year facility would store up to 100 megawatts of electricity using battery containers, inverters, fencing, access, drainage and landscaping.
“Proposal Permission is sought for the installation of a battery storage facility with ancillary infrastructure, including security fencing, access, landscaping and biodiversity enhancements to provide balancing services to the local electricity grid for a period of 40 years. The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is anticipated to provide capacity up to 100 megawatts (MW) of electricity during its operational life (c.40 years).”
“Storage Container finished in green steel-clad panels and auxiliary transformer. • A Welfare building 9.7 metres in length and 3 metres wide. The structure would have a total height above ground level of 3 metres. No external materials have been specified. • DNO Control Room with maximum height 5 metres. No external materials specified. • landscape planting as identified on drawing number 84.001. Biodiversity Net Gain on site is proposed.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A parish councillor and a resident spoke against the application, while two representatives spoke for it, including a fire safety specialist.
The vote
The committee rejected the motion to approve by seven votes to three, with no abstentions, then voted on refusal reasons.
“The recommendations (as amended in the addendum paper and during the meeting) were moved by Cllr Oliver and seconded by Cllr Cockarill.”
“Following further discussion, it was proposed by Cllr Forster and seconded by Cllr Radley that the Committee refuse planning permission for the reason of the cumulative effect on the landscape, residential amenity and the industrialisation of a rural area, with the wording for the reasons for refusal to be finalised by the Development Manager in consultation with the Chair.”
Minutes
The decision and reasons
Planning permission was refused because the committee considered the cumulative effect on landscape, residential amenity and the industrialisation of a rural area unacceptable.
“The Committee refused planning permission and authorised the Development Manager to finalise the wording of the reasons for refusal in consultation with the Chair.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“Reasons for refusal in consultation with the Chair. 58”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Hart Development Management Committee minutes, 18 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Hart's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Hart
- Date
- Wednesday 18 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Hart committee decisions →
This committee's year
14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.