38 residential flats at Parsons Green, Fulham, London
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Hammersmith And Fulham Planning and Development Control Committee on 20 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed replacing garages and sheds with a part-four, part-five-storey building containing 38 flats, solar panels, green roofs, heat pumps, cycle stores and landscaping.
“Description: Demolition of the existing garages and sheds, redevelopment of the site comprising the erection of part four, part five storey building to provide 38no self-contained residential flats (Class C3); installation of solar panels, green roofing and air source heat pumps with acoustic enclosure at roof level; removal of existing dropped kerb on Pearscroft Road, erection of cycle stores and associated external landscaping. Drg Nos:”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The approximately 0.2-hectare site contained storage blocks, parking and a small grassed area between Pearscroft Road and Sandilands Road, near homes and William Parnell Park.
“The site is located between Pearscroft Road and Sandilands Road, both of which connect to Wandsworth Bridge Road to the east of Parsons Green. Sandilands Road is a cul-de-sac serving a row of dwellings and providing access to a garage block north of the site, while Pearscroft Road runs northeast past the site towards Bagley Lane.”
“The southeastern boundary fronts Pearscroft Road, with the site abutting the pavement and linear on-street parking. Beyond Pearscroft Road lies the entrance to William Parnell Park, a substantial local green space providing a range of play and recreational facilities for nearby residents. The park includes designated play areas for ages 0–5 and 5–12+, as well as a grassed area for informal play and sports.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Permission for 33 dwellings was granted in 2016 but not implemented, while 2024 pre-application discussions considered a 38-home scheme and design issues.
“In 2016 planning permission was granted (2016/01960/FR3) for the demolition of the existing structures and redevelopment of the site to provide 33 dwellings. Permission not implemented.”
“Officer comment – officers have worked with the design team to review and incorporate the suggested changes to the scheme ahead of planning submission. Where achievable comments have helped to evolve the scheme design. Some changes have not been implemented due to issues in relation to their impacts upon the continued amenity of existing properties, and the balance to upgrade local routes and connections.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Seven objections were received, while the Environment Agency, Metropolitan Police and Thames Water raised no objection subject to stated matters.
“The Metropolitan Police (Designing Out Crime Officer) raise no objection subject to advice provided regarding Secured by Design measures.”
“Thames Water raise no objection subject to conditions.”
Officer report
Concerns raised
Objections covered loss of green space, design and height, daylight, privacy, noise, parking, traffic, consultation, construction disturbance, drainage, fire safety and contamination.
“- Noise from terrace and plant - Loss of light and overshadowing - Need for daylight and sunlight assessment - Overbearing impact - Loss of outlook - Overlooking and loss of privacy - Management of terrace and green buffer - Restrictions on terrace usage…”
“- Drainage impact - Cumulative impact of development (EIA regulations) - Fire risk and evacuation concerns - Contamination, including asbestos - Existing fly-tipping - Housing management issues - Previous issues with council housing - Disturbance from construction work (dust, noise, traffic) - Need for consultation and information during construction - Combined impact of multiple developments…”
Officer report
Who spoke
There were no registered speakers, and Tom Scriven gave a presentation.
The committee vote
The committee unanimously voted for both officer recommendations, with no votes against or members not voting recorded for either recommendation.
“The Committee voted on the officer recommendations for approval as amended by the Addendum as follows:”
Minutes
The decision
The committee authorised planning permission after a satisfactory legal document, subject to conditions, and authorised minor changes to the legal document or conditions.
“That the Director of Planning and Property be authorised to grant planning permission upon the completion of a satisfactory legal document and subject to the conditions listed below.”
“That the Director of Planning and Property, after consultation with the Assistant Director, Legal Services and the Chair of the Planning and Development Control Committee be authorised to make any minor changes to the proposed Heads of Terms of the legal document or proposed conditions, which may include the variation, addition, or deletion of conditions, any such changes shall be within their discretion.”
Minutes
Sources
- Hammersmith And Fulham Planning and Development Control Committee minutes, 20 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Hammersmith And Fulham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Hammersmith And Fulham
- Date
- Tuesday 20 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Hammersmith And Fulham committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.