Mixed-use hotel and offices at Shoreditch Island Site, London EC2A

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Hackney Planning Sub-Committee on 8 Oct 2025.

2024/0754Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed demolitions, new five-, eight- and 22-storey buildings, refurbished terraces, offices, aparthotel rooms, retail, homes and public routes.

“Proposal: Demolition of Titchfield House, Picture House, 109 Great Eastern Street and 95 – 97 Tabernacle Street and construction of a 5 storey building, 8- storey building and 22- storey building alongside refurbishment and extension of 95-107 Great Eastern Street and 87 – 93 Tabernacle Street in order to provide 6,578 sqm GIA of commercial floorspace (Use Class E), 232 long-stay aparthotel rooms (Use Class C1), 462 sqm GIA of retail and town centre floorspace (Use…”

Minutes

The site and its setting

The site is a triangular 0.24-hectare area bounded by Old Street, Tabernacle Square, Tabernacle Street and Singer Street, within the South Shoreditch Conservation Area.

“SITE CONTEXT 1.1 The site is located within the Hoxton East and Shoreditch ward within the London Borough of Hackney (‘LB Hackney’). The Site extends to approximately 0.24 ha and comprises the following buildings within the red line: Titchfield House, 69 – 85 Tabernacle Street 87 – 93 Tabernacle Street 95 – 97 Tabernacle Street 95 – 109 Great Eastern Street Picture House, 1-20 Singer Street 1.2 The site lies immediately south west of the junction between Old Street and…”

“The site is located within the South Shoreditch Conservation Area. It is also in close proximity to Pitfield Street Conservation Area, and Bunhill Fields/Finsbury Square Conservation Area. The following nearby properties are listed: ● Drinking fountain on Tabernacle Square (Grade II); ● St Michaels Church School, Leonard Street (Grade II) ● Central Foundation School for Boys (Grade II)”

Officer report

Why officers recommended approval

Officers considered the proposal acceptable overall because its offices, aparthotel, retail, improved homes, public realm and other benefits outweighed the identified harm.

“CONCLUSION 7.1 The Local Planning Authority has previously considered the application in accordance with the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework and the adopted Development Plan, concluding that the harm, which would largely be mitigated by way of public benefits of the scheme, conditions and obligations to be entered into.”

“The application has now also been assessed in accordance with the relevant policies of the Development Plan and, on balance, the merits and benefits of the proposal, which include the provision of an apart hotel, office space, retail provision and improved residential offer and overall townscape and other benefits of the proposal, are considered to outweigh the harm caused by the development.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Most consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while Historic England remained concerned about the tower’s height and harm to the conservation area.

“Historic England 4.8 Historic England recognises that concerted efforts have been made to reduce the impact of the scheme in the amended proposals. We are supportive of the approach to the historic terraces which has the potential to greatly enhance the site and the important contribution it makes to the SSCA.”

“For the purposes of the NPPF, we consider this harm would be in the lower part of the range of less than substantial harm, and that further lowering of the height of the tower would reduce the harm further. This would in turn help knit the scheme more successfully into its local context, reinforcing rather than diluting the positive changes proposed for the site’s historic terraces.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members heard why the site favoured employment uses, why aparthotel demand was claimed, how construction would proceed, and how terraces and local businesses would be treated.

“During the course of a discussion on the application a number of points were raised including the following: • The site's form, shape, and location within a priority office area made it unsuitable for traditional C3 residential units, prioritizing commercial and employment-generating uses.”

“The property developer, General Projects, actively partnered with local authorities, schools, and businesses to prioritize local businesses for workspace, deliver apprenticeship programs, and provide youth mentoring; • Members noted the inclusion of an additional condition to restrict the use of upper terraces to business hours. Vote: For: Cllr Michael Desmond, Cllr Clare Potter, Cllr Ali Sadek and Cllr Jessica Webb (Chair). Against: None. Abstained: None.”

Minutes

The decision

The Sub-Committee resolved to grant conditional planning permission.

“To grant conditional planning permission.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Hackney Planning Sub-Committee minutes, 8 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Hackney's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Hackney
Date
Wednesday 8 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)