Six-person HMO conversion at 48 Welton Road, Plumstead, London SE18
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Greenwich Local Planning Committee on 14 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought a six-person HMO, a rear extension, a hip-to-gable loft conversion with rear dormer, and refuse and cycle storage.
“That Full Planning Permission be GRANTED for the “Change of use of the existing dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a six-bedroom small HMO with a maximum capacity of six persons (Use Class C4), together with the erection of a 3-metre single-storey rear extension and the construction of a hip to gable loft conversion with rear dormer extension, including provision for refuse and cycle storage”.”
Officer report
Site and application history
The property is an existing dwellinghouse, and the application was deferred so a daytime parking survey could be prepared.
“ADDENDUM This Addendum Report is to reflect the submitted Car Parking Survey provided by the application following the 7 th April 2026 Local Planning Committee meeting whereby Members deferred the item to allow for a new Car Parking Survey to be prepared. The original Car Parking Survey was not considered sufficient by members given it was prepared during nighttime hours when the adjacent Willow Dene School was not in operation.”
“It was considered necessary to re-consult all neighbours and all those who had commented as part of the original consultation to allow further representations to be made in response to the submission of a new Car Parking Survey. The addendum includes a summary of the additional consultation responses received following the re-consultation of all neighbours and councillors as well as an assessment of the results contained within the newly submitted Car Parking Survey.”
Officer report
Ownership certificate corrected
The ownership certificate was amended from Certificate A to Certificate B and served on the correct owner for at least 21 days.
“Following the deferral on the 7 th April 2026 it was found that the incorrect ownership certificate had been served and that Certificate B rather A should have been served given the applicant was not the owner of the property. This has since been amended and the correct certificate has been served on the correct owner of the property for the requisite period of at least 21 days.”
Officer report
Who spoke
The ward councillor spoke against the proposal, residents raised objections, and the applicant’s agent defended the parking survey and parking provision.
Members’ discussion
Officers said permitted development rights, the site’s surroundings and the revised survey made the extensions, parking and neighbour impacts acceptable.
“ITEM NO: 4 rights. This meant that the loft conversion could be built without planning permission, and as noted earlier, appeal decisions had established that this must be considered when assessing applications. Although the rear dormer loft conversion did not comply with the Council's Urban Design Guide, officers considered it acceptable because it could be constructed under permitted development rights.”
“The concerns raised about vehicles blocking driveways, would be appear that these problems were largely related to activities associated with the nearby school rather than the proposed development itself. A daylight and sunlight assessment was not considered necessary as due to the position of the extension, its orientation relative to neighbouring properties, and the path of the sun.”
Minutes
How members voted
Members rejected a refusal motion based on parking issues by three votes to six, then approved the application by six votes to three.
“A Member put forward a refusal motion on the basis on the noted parking issues. The Motion was seconded and the Chair put the motion to the vote and with…”
“The Chair put the substantive Approval Motion to the vote and with…”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
Full planning permission was granted for the HMO, extensions and storage, subject to conditions and possible minor wording changes.
“To authorise the Assistant Director (Planning & Building Control) to make any minor change to the detailed wording of the recommended conditions, as set out in Appendix 2 of the main report, its addendum and the minutes of the Local Planning Committee meeting, where the Assistant Director (Planning and Building Control) considers it appropriate, before issuing the final notice.”
Minutes
Sources
- Greenwich Local Planning Committee minutes, 14 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Greenwich's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Greenwich Local Planning Committee
- Council
- Greenwich
- Date
- Tuesday 14 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 6 for, 3 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Greenwich committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
44 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.