11-bedroom HMO and pub at The Clarence Tavern, Gosport

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Gosport Regulatory Board on 3 Dec 2025.

25/00153/FULLApproved

What is proposed

The application would convert a vacant public house into an 11-bedroom HMO while retaining a smaller public house and adding extensions and facade changes.

“CHANGE OF USE FROM PUBLIC HOUSE (SUI GENERIS) TO AN 11 BEDROOM HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION (SUI GENERIS) AND PUBLIC HOUSE (SUI GENERIS) TO INCLUDE A FIRST FLOOR REAR EXTENSION AND AMENDMENTS TO THE FENESTRATION OF EACH ELEVATION (as amended by a revised internal layout received 24.10.2025). The Clarence Tavern 1 Clarence Road Gosport Hampshire PO12 1BB”

“The application site is a currently vacant Public House located on the eastern side of the junction of Clarence Road with Mumby Road and with King Street, within the Urban Area of Gosport as defined within the Gosport Borough Local Plan 2011-20209. The site is a two storey building with accommodation in the loft space and a single storey addition to the eastern side.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers considered the proposal acceptable for housing, amenity, highways, heritage and ecology reasons, and recommended permission with conditions and mitigation.

“Overall, the proposed change of use would retain (and in parts restore), the large majority of the exterior of the NDHA, keeping this important asset as part of the Borough's rich heritage. Subject to further details which could be secured by condition, it is considered that the small loss of historic fabric (the chimney), would be offset by the retention of the building, bringing it back into use and addressing some unsympathetic alterations.”

“It is considered that the proposed development of the site to provide an 11 bed HMO and a licenced premises is acceptable in principle and that this proposal would not have a detrimental impact upon the amenities of neighbouring residents in terms of loss of privacy, loss of light or overbearing impacts.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Most consultees raised no objection, while Natural England sought further information and others requested conditions on waste, noise, highways and construction.

“Natural England Further information required.”

“Streetscene (Waste & Cleansing) No objection. The HMO would require 1x1100 domestic waste bin and 1x 360 domestic waste bin and the same for recycling. The submitted drawings do not show adequate space for the storage and manoeuvring of bins and do not make provision for future provision/capacity for food waste.”

Officer report

What residents said

Nine objections raised concerns about overcrowding, parking, noise, fire safety, antisocial behaviour, heritage, waste, consultation and the lack of outdoor space.

“- This development will impact on the surrounding area, which is already, in my opinion, overcrowded. - This is very close to existing buildings, flats etc, and will make it even more closed in. - This is very, very close to the flats in King Street, where many small children live. - With so many properties surrounding this proposal, it could well be a fire risk to many. - There is a lack of car parking in the area, especially around the Clarence.”

“- The noise level from the pub was unacceptable at times , l cannot see this changing with a minimum of 11 people in the building, there is no facilities for 11 cars let alone parking, this area is absolutely horrendous the majority of the time I feel that this area has been saturated with living accommodation already. - The occupants of the HMO will give rise to anti-social behaviour in the case of those dependent on alcohol and drugs. This is already an issue for St.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The committee resolved to approve the application subject to the conditions in the report.

“RESOLVED: That application 25/00153/FULL be approved, subject to the conditions in the report of the Development Manager.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

“Regulatory Board 3 December 2025 8 Members questioned the provision of parking for the site and it was acknowledged that its location central to transport hubs had mitigated the need for parking but Members felt that if the development wanted to attract professionals like apprentices, it was likely they would have a vehicle.”

“Members accepted that the Public House had not been sustainable, and that this was an opportunity to retain the public house in some form but expressed regret that the original public house was not saved.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Gosport Regulatory Board minutes, 3 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Gosport's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Gosport
Date
Wednesday 3 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →