Illuminated barber signage at 28 Broad Street, March
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Fenland Planning Committee on 12 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective consent for an internally illuminated fascia sign and an externally illuminated rotating projecting barber pole.
“Display of 1 x internally illuminated fascia sign and 1 x externally illuminated rotating projecting barber pole (retrospective)”
“This application is for the display of 1 x internally illuminated fascia sign and 1 x externally illuminated rotating projecting barber pole.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The premises are on Broad Street in March Conservation Area, near several Grade II listed buildings including a fountain.
“The application site is situated on the western side of Broad Street, within the market town of March. The site is situated within the March Conservation Area. There are also a number of Grade II Listed Buildings surrounding the application site, including a Grade II Listed fountain.”
“The building is currently occupied by 4K Cuts and was previously occupied by Kleanco Dry Cleaners & Laundry. The advert is already in situ.”
Officer report
Planning background
There was no relevant planning history, although a similar illuminated fascia sign nearby was refused in September 2025.
“However, an advertisement consent application was refused in September 2025 at No. Broad Street, currently occupied by F & S Majestic Turkish Restaurant. This application was for 1 x internally illuminated fascia sign, and it was concluded to adversely impact on the streetscene and character of the area and failed to protect and enhance heritage assets.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the oversized, bright and illuminated signage would harm the conservation area and nearby listed fountain canopy.
“The oversized signage, overly bright backlit text and the illuminated barber pole detract from the character, appearance and setting of the March Conservation Area and the setting of the GII listed fountain canopy adjacent, resulting in less than substantial harm to the setting of the March Conservation Area and an adjacent listed building.”
“The proposed signage fails to make a positive contribution and therefore is considered to adversely impact on the visual amenity of the streetscene and character of the area and fails to protect and enhance heritage assets. The scheme is in contravention of Policies LP16 and LP18 of the Fenland Local Plan and does not comply with the requirements of paragraph 141 of the NPPF.”
Officer report
What consultees said
The parish council recommended approval, the conservation officer objected, and environmental health, highways and archaeology consultees raised no objections or comments.
“Parish/Town Council:. Recommendation: Approval.”
“Environment & Health Services (FDC): The Environmental Health Team note and accept the submitted information and have 'No Objections' to the proposals, as they are unlikely to have a detrimental effect on the local amenity as a result of artificial light overspill and/or glare.”
Officer report
Residents’ views
No response was received from the March Society or local residents and interested parties.
“Local Residents/Interested Parties: No Response Received.”
Officer report
Member discussion
Members discussed other unauthorised signs, modern LED lighting, the commercial street setting, the barber pole’s recognised use and heritage impacts.
“Members asked questions of officers as follows: • Councillor Marks referred to USA Chicken and other signage in the area and asked why has this shop been brought before committee when there is other signage that does not have permission? Alan Davies responded that the applicant’s went ahead and made an application following an enforcement investigation whereas the property next door also has unauthorised signage and the owners of that property have not come forward with a…”
“Councillor Imafidon made the point that this is a trading street so it has to somehow make itself known to passing trade and customers and the rotating pole is a recognised international sign to show that it is a barber’s shop. He stated that he will be supporting the application as he does not think it is as detrimental because it is a commercial street.”
Minutes
The vote
Councillor Benney proposed, Councillor Marks seconded, and members agreed to grant the application against the officer recommendation, with conditions delegated to officers.
“Proposed by Councillor Benney, seconded by Councillor Marks and agreed that the application be GRANTED against officer’s recommendation, with authority delegated to officers to apply conditions.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
Members granted the application because they considered it would not harm the street scene, conservation area or listed building, would support regeneration, and would not alter the building fabric.
“Members do not support officer’s recommendation of refusal of planning permission as they feel that the proposal is not detrimental to the street scene, Conservation Area or Listed Building, it enhances the regeneration of the Town Centre and character of the area and does not detract from it, and the fabric of the building is not being altered.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision”.
Sources
- Fenland Planning Committee minutes, 12 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Fenland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Fenland Planning Committee
- Council
- Fenland
- Date
- Wednesday 12 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Fenland committee decisions →
This committee's year
32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 20 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.