Six residential flats at Hare And Hounds Hotel, Wisbech
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Fenland Planning Committee on 15 Oct 2025.
What was proposed
The proposal would convert the hotel into six self-contained flats, with internal changes, repairs, a bin store and cycle storage.
“Internal and external works to a Listed Building to form 6 x residential flats and to erect a bin store and cycle store…”
“The proposal seeks planning permission and listed building consent to convert the building into six self-contained flats, involving internal reconfigurations, removal of non-original structures, and various repairs and alterations.”
Officer report
The site
The site contains a three-storey Grade II listed building in Wisbech Town Centre and the Conservation Area, with a rear courtyard and access from Chapel Road.
“The application site comprises a three-storey Grade II Listed Building within Wisbech Town Centre and the Wisbech Conservation Area, most recently in use as a public house with hotel accommodation. The building is in generally poor condition and has undergone substantial historic alterations. The site includes a rear courtyard, outbuilding, and vehicular access from Chapel Road.”
“The application site lies to the north of North Brink and is occupied by a three- storey, Grade II listed building, most recently in lawful use as a public house with hotel accommodation. The host building, in generally poor cosmetic condition, has undergone substantial extensions, changes, and alterations over a prolonged period. It is situated within Wisbech Town Centre, the Wisbech Conservation Area, and Flood Zone 3.”
Officer report
Why officers recommended refusal
Officers considered that the scheme would lose an employment and community use, harm historic fabric and provide poor living conditions.
“The internal alterations and removal of historic fabric would cause less than substantial but significant harm to the Grade II Listed Building and its setting within the Conservation Area. The proposal does not constitute a sensitive reuse and fails to preserve or enhance the heritage asset, contrary to Policies LP16 and LP18, Section 66 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, and Chapter 16 of the NPPF.”
“In summary, the harm to the heritage asset and the loss of community and employment uses outweigh the limited benefits of the scheme and therefore the application is recommended for refusal.”
Officer report
What consultees said
The Town Council supported the applications, while the Conservation Officer objected to the loss of commercial use, heritage harm and poor amenity.
“Objects to the loss of the commercial ground floor on the vitality of the conservation area. Also raises further concern that the number of small flats results in overdevelopment of the building, which in turn leads to a general low level of amenity for future occupants.”
“However, whilst some aspects of the original objection have been overcome, the Conservation Officer maintains an objection finding less than substantial harm to the character and appearance and historic significance of the building. Also notes overdevelopment, resulting in poor amenity.”
Officer report
What other people said
A councillor and eleven letters supported restoring the building, its frontage and its use for housing.
“Supports the planning application for the Hare and Hounds, an empty historic building on North Brink. They value the proposed restoration of the frontage with traditional wood-frame windows, as well as the inclusion of parking, bin, and cycle storage. They believe approval will restore the building’s use and preserve North Brink’s architectural character.”
“Supporting Comment Officer Response Increase support to economy Comments noted and discussed in the principle section of below report Effective use of empty building Comments noted and discussed in the principle section of below report Other flats on the waterfront are really nice Comments noted Good housing mix Comments noted and discussed in the principle section of below report Addressing housing need Comments noted and discussed in the principle section of below report…”
Officer report
Members’ discussion
Members considered whether leaving the building unused would harm the area and whether the planned alterations would retain its heritage.
“Members did not support the officer’s recommendation of refusal as they feel that by leaving the building it will detract from the area, and the planned alterations will be minimal meaning that the heritage of the building will be retained and the property will be safeguarded.”
Minutes
The vote
Councillor French proposed, Councillor Murphy seconded, and the committee agreed to grant the application against the officer recommendation.
“FYR25/0504/LB Proposed by Councillor Mrs French, seconded by Councillor Murphy and agreed that the application be GRANTED against the officer’s recommendation with authority delegated to officers to apply conditions.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “Members’ discussion”.
Sources
- Fenland Planning Committee minutes, 15 October 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Fenland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Fenland Planning Committee
- Council
- Fenland
- Date
- Wednesday 15 October 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Fenland committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 15 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.