Lidl retail store at Former Hcc Depot Land Adjoining Cartwright Drive & Southampton Road Titchfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Fareham Planning Committee on 20 May 2026.

P/25/1272/FPApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed a 2,164-square-metre Lidl store with 121 parking spaces, cycle parking, a delivery bay and revised site access.

“Description of Proposal 3.1 The proposal seeks planning permission for the erection of a 2,164 sqm Lidl retail store with a 1,457 sqm sales area, along with 121 car parking spaces, cycle parking, a delivery bay, and alterations to the site access.”

“Access to the site would be taken from Cartwright Drive via a new access point created at the northeastern corner of the site. Car parking would be located to the south and east of the store, providing a total of 121 spaces, including 7 disabled spaces, 2 for electric vehicle charging spaces, as well as 5 spaces for motorcycles. Spaces will also be provided for 12 cycles for customers with additional spaces for staff.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The triangular, mainly hardstanding site lies at the Southampton Road and Cartwright Drive junction, beside homes, businesses, a hotel and a health club.

“Site Description 2.1 The application site comprises an area of open land, triangular in shape, and predominantly laid to hardstanding. The site measures approximately 1.3 ha and is located to the north of St Margaret’s Roundabout, occupying the corner formed by the junction of Southampton Road (A27) and Cartwright Drive.”

“To the southwest, across Southampton Road, is a petrol filling station with an associated convenience store, along with the Kites Croft Business Park and Industrial Estate. To the southeast, across Cartwright Drive, is a hotel and health club.”

Officer report

Earlier use of the land

The land was formerly a temporary highways depot with offices; that use ended, the structures were removed and hardstanding remained.

“Relevant Planning History 5.1 The site was previously used as a temporary highways’ depot with associated temporary office accommodation. This use has since ceased and all associated structures have been removed. The hardstanding across the central part of the site remains in place.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the retail need and economic benefits outweighed limited conflict with employment allocation policies.

“Whilst the proposal conflicts with the site allocation under Policies E1 and E4a, when the development plan is read as a whole, and having regard to material considerations, including retail policy compliance and the identified economic benefits, that conflict is not considered to be determinative. The proposal is therefore considered to accord with the development plan when taken as a whole and with the objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.”

Officer report

Retail and traffic assessment

The site was outside a defined centre, but officers found no suitable sequential alternatives, no significant centre harm and no severe highway impact.

“The site lies within the urban area but outside any defined centre as shown on the Local Plan Policies Map. Nor is the site within the Primary Shopping Area. It is therefore classified as an out-of-centre location. The Lidl proposal is therefore a main town centre use being promoted in an out-of-centre location, meaning that a full assessment under Policy R2 and the NPPF sequential and impact tests is required.”

“The Sequential Test 8.19 Having regard to sequential and impact tests ensures that any proposed main town centre uses which are not in an existing town centre are in the best locations to support the vitality and vibrancy of designated retail centres. As set out above, Policy R2 requires a full sequential test to be carried out demonstrating that there are no sites in the centres or parades that are available, suitable or viable.”

Officer report

Conditions and legal agreement

Approval was subject to a Section 106 agreement, highway and sustainable transport measures, biodiversity monitoring and planning conditions.

“Recommendation 9.1 Subject to the applicant/owner first entering into a planning obligation pursuant to Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on terms drafted by the Solicitor to the Council in respect of the following:”

“Biodiversity Net Gain Monitoring vii) To secure a financial contribution for monitoring of any significant on- site BNG.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The committee voted unanimously to grant permission, with nine members in favour and none against.

“(i) GRANT full planning permission, subject to: -”

“Was voted on and CARRIED. (Voting: 9 in favour; 0 against)”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to the report’s conditions, the update changes and delegated authority for detailed amendments.

“(i) GRANT planning permission, subject to: -”

“(ii) Authority DELEGATED to the Head of Planning to: -”

Minutes

Sources

  • Fareham Planning Committee minutes, 20 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Fareham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Fareham
Date
Wednesday 20 May 2026
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

40 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →